What are the hemodynamic findings of restrictive cardiomyopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hemodynamic Findings of Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

Restrictive cardiomyopathy is characterized by a distinctive hemodynamic profile featuring markedly elevated ventricular filling pressures with normal or near-normal ventricular volumes, resulting in a steep pressure-volume relationship where small increases in volume lead to exaggerated increases in diastolic pressure. 1

Key Hemodynamic Features

Ventricular Pressure Patterns

  • Characteristic "dip and plateau" or "square root" pattern in ventricular diastolic pressure tracings, reflecting impaired ventricular filling 2
  • Markedly elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), typically >18-30 mmHg 2, 3
  • Elevated right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP), though usually lower than LVEDP 2
  • Rapid early diastolic pressure rise with a characteristic "dip and plateau" pattern for early diastolic LV pressure changes 2

Atrial Pressure Patterns

  • M- or W-shaped atrial pressure waveforms 2
  • Elevated filling pressures in all four cardiac chambers 2
  • Attenuated or absent Y-descent in right atrial pressure waveform (similar to cardiac tamponade) 2

Ventricular Volumes and Function

  • Normal or reduced ventricular chamber sizes 2
  • Normal ventricular ejection fraction in most cases (preserved systolic function) 2, 1
  • Biatrial enlargement due to chronically elevated ventricular filling pressures 2

Echocardiographic Findings

Mitral Inflow Patterns

  • Restrictive filling pattern with E/A ratio >2.5 2
  • Shortened deceleration time (DT) of E velocity <150 msec 2
  • Shortened isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) <50 msec 2

Tissue Doppler Findings

  • Decreased septal and lateral e' velocities (3-4 cm/sec) 2
  • Higher lateral e' compared to septal e' velocity (unlike constrictive pericarditis which shows "annulus reversus") 2
  • Elevated E/e' ratio >14, indicating increased left atrial pressure 2

Other Echocardiographic Parameters

  • Markedly increased left atrial volume index (>50 mL/m²) 2
  • Pulmonary vein flow showing reduced S/D ratio 2
  • Possible mid-diastolic flow (L velocity) due to slow LV relaxation and increased left atrial pressure 2

Differentiating from Constrictive Pericarditis

  • In restrictive cardiomyopathy, pulmonary artery systolic pressures are often elevated, whereas they are usually normal in constrictive pericarditis 2
  • Respiratory variation in ventricular filling is less pronounced in restrictive cardiomyopathy compared to constrictive pericarditis 2
  • Systolic area index (ratio of right ventricular to left ventricular systolic pressure-time area during inspiration versus expiration) helps differentiate the two conditions 2
  • In restrictive cardiomyopathy, lateral e' is higher than septal e', whereas in constrictive pericarditis, septal e' is often higher than lateral e' (annulus reversus) 2

Clinical Implications

  • Grade 3 diastolic dysfunction is typically present in advanced restrictive cardiomyopathy and is associated with poor outcomes 2
  • The hemodynamic profile reflects increased myocardial stiffness due to various pathological processes including interstitial fibrosis, infiltration, or storage disorders 1
  • These hemodynamic findings translate clinically to symptoms of dyspnea, fluid retention, and fatigue due to impaired cardiac output reserve 2

Pitfalls in Diagnosis

  • Differentiation from constrictive pericarditis can be challenging and may require invasive hemodynamic assessment 2
  • The restrictive filling pattern on echocardiography must be interpreted in clinical context, as it can occur transiently in other conditions 2
  • Multiple imaging modalities including echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and cardiac catheterization may be necessary for definitive diagnosis 1
  • Normal or mildly increased wall thickness does not exclude restrictive cardiomyopathy 2, 1

References

Research

Restrictive cardiomyopathy: definition and diagnosis.

European heart journal, 2022

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Morphologic spectrum of primary restrictive cardiomyopathy.

The American journal of cardiology, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.