Hemodynamic Findings of Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Restrictive cardiomyopathy is characterized by a distinctive hemodynamic profile featuring markedly elevated ventricular filling pressures with normal or near-normal ventricular volumes, resulting in a steep pressure-volume relationship where small increases in volume lead to exaggerated increases in diastolic pressure. 1
Key Hemodynamic Features
Ventricular Pressure Patterns
- Characteristic "dip and plateau" or "square root" pattern in ventricular diastolic pressure tracings, reflecting impaired ventricular filling 2
- Markedly elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), typically >18-30 mmHg 2, 3
- Elevated right ventricular end-diastolic pressure (RVEDP), though usually lower than LVEDP 2
- Rapid early diastolic pressure rise with a characteristic "dip and plateau" pattern for early diastolic LV pressure changes 2
Atrial Pressure Patterns
- M- or W-shaped atrial pressure waveforms 2
- Elevated filling pressures in all four cardiac chambers 2
- Attenuated or absent Y-descent in right atrial pressure waveform (similar to cardiac tamponade) 2
Ventricular Volumes and Function
- Normal or reduced ventricular chamber sizes 2
- Normal ventricular ejection fraction in most cases (preserved systolic function) 2, 1
- Biatrial enlargement due to chronically elevated ventricular filling pressures 2
Echocardiographic Findings
Mitral Inflow Patterns
- Restrictive filling pattern with E/A ratio >2.5 2
- Shortened deceleration time (DT) of E velocity <150 msec 2
- Shortened isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) <50 msec 2
Tissue Doppler Findings
- Decreased septal and lateral e' velocities (3-4 cm/sec) 2
- Higher lateral e' compared to septal e' velocity (unlike constrictive pericarditis which shows "annulus reversus") 2
- Elevated E/e' ratio >14, indicating increased left atrial pressure 2
Other Echocardiographic Parameters
- Markedly increased left atrial volume index (>50 mL/m²) 2
- Pulmonary vein flow showing reduced S/D ratio 2
- Possible mid-diastolic flow (L velocity) due to slow LV relaxation and increased left atrial pressure 2
Differentiating from Constrictive Pericarditis
- In restrictive cardiomyopathy, pulmonary artery systolic pressures are often elevated, whereas they are usually normal in constrictive pericarditis 2
- Respiratory variation in ventricular filling is less pronounced in restrictive cardiomyopathy compared to constrictive pericarditis 2
- Systolic area index (ratio of right ventricular to left ventricular systolic pressure-time area during inspiration versus expiration) helps differentiate the two conditions 2
- In restrictive cardiomyopathy, lateral e' is higher than septal e', whereas in constrictive pericarditis, septal e' is often higher than lateral e' (annulus reversus) 2
Clinical Implications
- Grade 3 diastolic dysfunction is typically present in advanced restrictive cardiomyopathy and is associated with poor outcomes 2
- The hemodynamic profile reflects increased myocardial stiffness due to various pathological processes including interstitial fibrosis, infiltration, or storage disorders 1
- These hemodynamic findings translate clinically to symptoms of dyspnea, fluid retention, and fatigue due to impaired cardiac output reserve 2
Pitfalls in Diagnosis
- Differentiation from constrictive pericarditis can be challenging and may require invasive hemodynamic assessment 2
- The restrictive filling pattern on echocardiography must be interpreted in clinical context, as it can occur transiently in other conditions 2
- Multiple imaging modalities including echocardiography, cardiac MRI, and cardiac catheterization may be necessary for definitive diagnosis 1
- Normal or mildly increased wall thickness does not exclude restrictive cardiomyopathy 2, 1