Atrial Fibrillation Without Anticoagulation Significantly Increases Stroke Risk
Patients with atrial fibrillation who are not on anticoagulation therapy have a substantially increased risk for cerebrovascular accident (CVA). 1 This risk is well-established in multiple guidelines and clinical studies, with stroke rates increasing proportionally with additional risk factors.
Stroke Risk in Non-Anticoagulated AF Patients
- The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scoring systems quantify stroke risk in AF patients, with higher scores correlating with progressively increased stroke rates 1
- Even patients with a CHADS2 score of 0 (considered lowest risk) have an adjusted stroke rate of 1.9% per year when not anticoagulated 1
- As CHADS2 scores increase, annual stroke rates rise dramatically:
- Score 1: 2.8% per year
- Score 2: 4.0% per year
- Score 3: 5.9% per year
- Score 4: 8.5% per year
- Score 5: 12.5% per year
- Score 6: 18.2% per year 1
Mechanisms and Evidence
- AF promotes thrombus formation primarily in the left atrial appendage due to blood stasis, which can embolize to the cerebral circulation 1
- In the ROCKET-AF trial, patients with AF not receiving anticoagulation had a stroke rate of 2.4 per 100 patient-years 2
- A real-world study of AF patients with contraindications to anticoagulation showed a 4.1% incidence of ischemic stroke, with rates increasing with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores 3
- Patients with AF who cannot take anticoagulants due to bleeding risk remain at considerable risk for both ischemic and hemorrhagic events 3, 4
Impact of Anticoagulation on Stroke Risk
- Adjusted-dose oral anticoagulation reduces stroke risk by approximately 61% compared to placebo in patients with nonvalvular AF 1
- When anticoagulation is used in AF patients with contraindications, there is still a reduction in mortality (adjusted HR: 0.79), stroke (adjusted HR: 0.90), and all-cause hospitalization (adjusted HR: 0.93), though with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted HR: 1.42) 4
- Even suboptimal anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy provides some protection compared to no antithrombotic therapy, with less severe neurologic deficits and better functional outcomes at 3 months 5
Risk Stratification and Treatment Decisions
- The CHA2DS2-VASc score is recommended for stroke risk assessment in AF patients, with scores ≥2 (or ≥3 for females) generally warranting anticoagulation 1
- For patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1, careful consideration of individual bleeding risk versus stroke risk is needed 1
- Age is a powerful independent risk factor - patients ≥65 years with AF have significantly higher event rates even without other risk factors:
- Age <65 years with no risk factors: 0.23 events per 100 person-years
- Age 65-74 years with no risk factors: 2.05 events per 100 person-years
- Age ≥75 years with no risk factors: 3.99 events per 100 person-years 6
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Many AF patients who would benefit from anticoagulation do not receive it due to:
- The risk of thromboembolism in atrial flutter is generally considered lower than in AF but still elevated compared to sinus rhythm; similar risk stratification criteria are recommended 1
- Silent (asymptomatic) AF carries similar stroke risk as symptomatic AF, and should not be considered lower risk 1
- The threshold for anticoagulation may be lower with NOACs than with warfarin (stroke rate of 0.9% vs 1.7% per year) 1
In summary, the evidence clearly demonstrates that AF patients not receiving anticoagulation have a significantly increased risk of stroke, with the magnitude of risk determined by additional clinical factors that are captured in risk stratification tools like CHA2DS2-VASc.