What is the percentage likelihood of developing a secondary cancer after receiving 3.7 Gigabecquerels (GBq) of radioactive Iodine-131 (I-131)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Secondary Cancer Risk After Radioactive Iodine (I-131) Treatment

The percentage likelihood of developing a secondary cancer after receiving 3.7 Gigabecquerels (GBq) of radioactive Iodine-131 is approximately 2%, with a relative risk of 1.94 (95% CI: 1.15-3.05) compared to the general population. 1

Risk Assessment for Secondary Malignancies

  • The risk of developing secondary malignancies after I-131 therapy is dose-dependent, with cumulative doses exceeding 5.6-7.4 GBq (150-200 mCi) representing an increased risk 2
  • For a single 3.7 GBq (100 mCi) dose, which is commonly used for thyroid cancer treatment following thyroidectomy, permanent infertility would be uncommon, but there is still a risk of secondary malignancy 3
  • No cases of bladder cancer or leukemia were observed in patients who received a total activity of less than 37 GBq I-131 in long-term follow-up studies 1
  • The relative risk of developing any secondary malignancy after I-131 treatment is approximately 1.94 times higher than the general population 1

Types of Secondary Cancers

  • Leukemia and bladder cancer show significantly increased incidence after I-131 treatment, particularly at higher cumulative doses 1
  • Other reported secondary malignancies include cancers of the lung, thyroid, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, colon, rectum, kidney, and connective tissue 4
  • The risk appears to be related to the radiation dose received by specific organs, with estimated radiation doses to bone marrow in patients with leukemia ranging from 301-792 cGy and doses to the bladder in patients with bladder cancer ranging from 2250-10,350 cGy 1

Timeframe for Secondary Cancer Development

  • The latent period between radiation exposure and clinical presentation of most cancers may range from 2 years to decades 4
  • For leukemia specifically, the minimum latent period is approximately 2 years 4
  • Long-term follow-up studies have shown that the risk of secondary malignancies persists for many years after I-131 treatment 1

Risk Factors and Considerations

  • Patient age at treatment is an important factor, with younger patients generally at higher risk for radiation-induced malignancies 4
  • The cumulative dose of I-131 is a critical factor, with doses exceeding 5.6-7.4 GBq (150-200 mCi) showing increased risk 2
  • Caution should be exercised when considering repeated RAI therapies with a cumulative dose exceeding 37.0 GBq (1,000 mCi) due to the potential risk of developing secondary malignancies and other long-term toxicity 2

Clinical Implications and Monitoring

  • Patients who receive I-131 therapy should be monitored long-term for the development of secondary malignancies 5
  • The benefits of I-131 therapy in treating thyroid cancer must be weighed against the small but real risk of secondary malignancies 5
  • For patients receiving 3.7 GBq (100 mCi), which is a standard dose for thyroid cancer treatment, the risk is relatively low but still present 3, 2

Risk Mitigation Strategies

  • Using the lowest effective dose of I-131 necessary to achieve therapeutic goals can help minimize the risk of secondary malignancies 2
  • Proper hydration and frequent urination after I-131 administration can help reduce radiation exposure to the bladder 5
  • Regular follow-up and screening for secondary malignancies should be considered part of the long-term management plan for patients who have received I-131 therapy 5

References

Research

Subsequent malignancies in patients treated with 131-iodine for thyroid cancer.

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 1992

Guideline

Infertility Risk After Radioactive I-131 Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The benefits and risks of I-131 therapy in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer.

Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2009

Related Questions

What is radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for thyroid cancer?
What is the equation for calculating low dose Radioactive Iodine (RAI)?
What are the safety considerations for radioactive iodine (I-131) treatment for thyroid conditions?
Can a buprenorphine patch be used in a patient with thyroid cancer receiving I-131 (Iodine-131) therapy?
What are the treatment protocols for a patient requiring Sodium 131 (Radioiodine) therapy?
What is the role of steroids, such as methylprednisolone (corticosteroid), in patients with cauda equina syndrome?
What percentage of patients become infertile after receiving 3.7 Gigabecquerels (GBq) of radioactive Iodine-131 (I-131)?
Is a failed Low-Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test (LDDST) with two random elevated cortisol levels and normal Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) levels sufficient to establish Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) dependence?
Is elevated cortisol with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels greater than 15 and a failed low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) with a greater than 50% drop sufficient to diagnose adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome?
Is two serum elevated cortisol levels with Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) >15 pg/mL and a failed Low-Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test (LDDST) with a greater than 50% drop sufficient to proceed to Bilateral Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling (BIPSS) if Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is inconclusive?
What are the initial ventilator settings for a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patient in Type 2 respiratory failure?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.