What is the significance of a lesion becoming more visible on CT scan with increased slice thickness, despite initial improvement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The lesion's increased visibility on CT scan with increased slice thickness is likely due to technical factors rather than true changes in the lesion itself, and maintaining consistent slice thickness is crucial for accurate comparison over time. When evaluating the significance of a lesion becoming more visible on CT scan with increased slice thickness, despite initial improvement, it is essential to consider the impact of CT acquisition parameters on image quality. According to the study by 1, slice thickness plays a critical role in detecting colonic polyps, and it should be chosen to be at least half of the target polyp size to minimize partial volume averaging with adjacent air.

Key Considerations

  • The use of thinner CT slices provides better spatial resolution and can detect smaller structures more clearly, as demonstrated by the improved visibility of the lesion when the slice thickness was reduced to 3 mm or less 1.
  • Partial volume averaging can occur when the lesion is being averaged with surrounding normal tissue in thicker slices, leading to a "foggy" appearance.
  • Maintaining consistent slice thickness in future scans is crucial to allow for accurate comparison over time.
  • The apparent changes in visibility may be technical rather than biological, and the lesion may have been stable throughout the monitoring period.

Recommendations

  • Discuss with your radiologist about maintaining consistent slice thickness in future scans, preferably the thinner 2.50mm or 3 mm, to allow for more accurate comparison over time.
  • Consider having previous images reviewed with standardized parameters or possibly obtaining a different imaging modality like MRI for better tissue characterization if clinically indicated. The study by 1 highlights the importance of using multidetector scanners with 4 or more detectors for CT colonography, as they provide faster table speeds, better colonic distention, and fewer respiratory artifacts. However, the key factor in this scenario is the slice thickness, and its impact on the visibility of the lesion.

From the Research

Lesion Visibility on CT Scan

  • The visibility of a lesion on a CT scan can be affected by various factors, including the slice thickness used in the imaging process 2.
  • Increasing the slice thickness can potentially make a lesion more visible, despite initial improvement, due to the way that the imaging technology captures and reconstructs the data 2.
  • However, the relationship between slice thickness and lesion visibility is complex and can be influenced by a range of factors, including the type and location of the lesion, as well as the specific imaging protocols used 2.

Imaging Techniques for Lesion Evaluation

  • Various imaging techniques, including CT scans, MRI, and PET/CT, can be used to evaluate lesions and differentiate between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues 3, 4, 5.
  • Each imaging modality has its own strengths and limitations, and the choice of technique will depend on the specific clinical context and the characteristics of the lesion being evaluated 3, 4, 5.
  • For example, CT scans are commonly used for the initial evaluation of pancreatic lesions, while MRI and PET/CT may be used for further characterization and staging 3, 4, 5.

Radiomic Features and Lesion Characterization

  • Radiomic features, which are extracted from medical images, can provide valuable information for lesion characterization and differentiation 2.
  • However, the use of contrast medium in CT imaging can affect the stability and discrimination power of radiomic features, potentially masking the intrinsic variability of tumor lesions 2.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between radiomic features, lesion characteristics, and imaging protocols, and to develop more effective methods for lesion evaluation and differentiation 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Exploring the variability of radiomic features of lung cancer lesions on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced chest CT imaging.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2021

Research

Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica, 2020

Research

PET/CT in the diagnosis and prognosis of osteosarcoma.

Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition), 2018

Related Questions

What is the best imaging modality, Computed Tomography (CT) scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), for a hypoechoic pancreas mass?
What is the best specialty referral for a patient with a soft tissue nodular density in the right periorbital soft tissue following a prior injury, presenting with headache and a negative Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the orbits?
What is the management approach for a bulky pancreas?
What is the management approach for a 9mm hypoattenuating lesion at the pancreatic neck?
What antibiotic is recommended for a soft tissue infected cyst?
What is the maximum dose limit for local anesthesia using 1% lidocaine (lignocaine) with epinephrine (adrenaline)?
What is the most likely cause of diaphoresis (sweats) among duloxetine, candesartan, and pregabalin?
Can duloxetine (Cymbalta) induce diaphoresis (sweating) triggered by anxiety?
What is the significance of a lesion located in the fat anterior to the psoas muscle, caudal to the lower pole of the kidney, which appeared foggy on initial CT scan with 3.75mm slice thickness, decreased in visibility over two years with slice thicknesses of 3.75mm and 3.00mm, but became more visible on a 3-year scan with 2.50mm slice thickness, measuring 3mm?
Would a ganglion impar (ganglion of impar) block alleviate chronic bladder and pelvic pain?
What is the significance of a lesion located in the fat anterior to the psoas muscle, caudal to the lower pole of the kidney, which appeared foggy on computed tomography (CT) scans with varying slice thicknesses over a 3-year period, initially decreasing in visibility before becoming more visible at 3 years, measuring 3mm?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.