Is salivary hormone testing (hormone level testing using saliva samples) accurate for determining hormone levels?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Salivary Hormone Testing Accuracy for Determining Hormone Levels

Salivary hormone testing is not recommended as a primary method for determining accurate hormone levels due to limited evidence supporting its diagnostic accuracy and numerous confounding variables that can affect test results. 1

Limitations of Salivary Hormone Testing

Evidence on Diagnostic Accuracy

  • Salivary hormone testing has shown limited diagnostic accuracy for most hormones, with only a few specific hormones showing potential utility 1
  • For testosterone specifically, a single study examining salivary testosterone in PCOS showed moderate accuracy with an AUC of 0.76, which is insufficient for reliable clinical use 1
  • Current guidelines indicate that serum total testosterone, calculated free testosterone (cFT), and free androgen index (FAI) have the highest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing hormonal conditions like hyperandrogenism 1

Confounding Variables Affecting Results

  • Multiple pre-analytical variables significantly impact salivary hormone measurements, including:
    • Time of day (diurnal variations affect hormone levels) 1
    • Physical activity (increases salivary cortisol and other hormone levels) 1
    • Mental stressors (elevate salivary cortisol) 1
    • Recent food/drink consumption 1
    • Oral hygiene practices 1
    • Collection method (passive drooling vs. absorbent pad methods) 1
    • Collection materials (cotton materials can retain hormones) 1

Collection and Measurement Challenges

  • Practical implementation issues include:
    • Insufficient saliva volume in many patients 1
    • Blood contamination of samples 1
    • Limited availability of standardized testing methods 1
    • Enzyme immunoassay testing not routinely available at most centers 1

Specific Hormones and Testing Accuracy

Cortisol

  • Guidelines specifically recommend against using salivary cortisol over serum cortisol for diagnosing conditions like critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency 1
  • While salivary cortisol may correlate with free cortisol, no studies demonstrate improved patient outcomes when using salivary testing 1

Sex Hormones

  • Salivary testosterone shows only moderate diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.76) 1
  • Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) present in saliva can influence steroid concentrations and affect accuracy 2
  • Contamination from blood or gingival fluids can significantly alter hormone measurements 2

When Salivary Testing May Have Limited Utility

  • Monitoring diurnal variations in hormone levels when multiple samples are needed 3
  • Situations where blood collection is particularly challenging 4, 5
  • As a complementary (not replacement) test to serum measurements 4

Recommended Alternatives

  • Serum total hormone levels remain the standard for most clinical applications 1
  • For free hormone assessment:
    • Calculated free testosterone from total testosterone and SHBG measurements is more reliable than salivary testing 1
    • Free androgen index (FAI) provides better diagnostic accuracy than salivary measurements 1
    • For cortisol, serum total cortisol is recommended over salivary measurements 1

Conclusion

Based on current evidence, salivary hormone testing cannot be recommended as a reliable method for determining accurate hormone levels in clinical practice. The numerous confounding variables, collection challenges, and limited evidence supporting diagnostic accuracy make serum hormone testing the preferred method for clinical decision-making that impacts patient morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Sex hormone binding globulin in saliva.

Clinical endocrinology, 1988

Research

Human saliva as a diagnostic specimen.

The Journal of nutrition, 2001

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.