Management of Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Valve Endocarditis
The core management principles for both bioprosthetic and mechanical valve endocarditis are fundamentally the same, with differences primarily in pathogenesis patterns and surgical considerations rather than in the overall treatment approach. 1
Pathophysiological Differences
- In early prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), infection typically involves the junction between the sewing ring and annulus, leading to perivalvular complications (abscesses, dehiscence, pseudo-aneurysms, fistulae) regardless of valve type 1
- In late bioprosthetic PVE, infection more commonly affects the valve leaflets, causing vegetations, cusp rupture and perforation - a pattern specific to bioprosthetic valves 1
- Mechanical valves have less biological tissue available for bacterial colonization, which may explain some differences in infection patterns 2
Diagnostic Considerations
- Diagnosis is challenging for both valve types, with echocardiography and blood cultures being less sensitive in PVE compared to native valve endocarditis 1
- Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is mandatory for suspected PVE but has lower diagnostic value than in native valve endocarditis 1
- Persistent fever should trigger suspicion of PVE in any prosthetic valve patient 1
- Identification of a new periprosthetic leak is a major diagnostic criterion, potentially requiring additional imaging modalities like CT or nuclear imaging 1
Medical Management
- Antibiotic therapy principles are identical for both valve types:
Surgical Management Considerations
Indications for surgery are the same for both valve types:
Surgical principles for both valve types include:
Valve Selection for Replacement in PVE
The European Society of Cardiology does not favor any specific valve substitute for PVE but recommends a tailored approach for each individual patient, as mechanical and biological prostheses have shown similar operative mortality. 1
For extensive aortic root destruction:
For complex cases with locally uncontrolled infection:
Long-term Outcomes and Considerations
- Some research suggests mechanical valves may have lower recurrence rates of endocarditis compared to bioprosthetic valves 3, 2, 4
- A recent meta-analysis indicated bioprosthetic valves may be associated with higher risk of infective endocarditis compared to mechanical valves 5
- However, the ESC guidelines emphasize that when complete debridement of annular abscesses is achieved, mechanical prostheses and xenografts have shown similar results for persistent/recurrent infection and survival 1
Follow-up Recommendations
- Follow-up is identical for both valve types:
- Regular clinical and echocardiographic follow-up during the first year after treatment completion 1
- Blood samples (white cell count, CRP) and blood cultures at initial follow-up visit and when clinically indicated 1
- Good oral health maintenance and preventive dentistry are mandatory 1
- Patient education about signs and symptoms of recurrent infection 1
Caveat
- The choice between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves for replacement in PVE should consider patient-specific factors beyond the risk of recurrent endocarditis, including age, need for anticoagulation, and comorbidities 1