What are the key weaning indices for mechanical ventilation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Key Weaning Indices for Mechanical Ventilation

The frequency-to-tidal volume ratio (fR/VT ratio), also known as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), is the most accurate predictor of weaning success, with values less than 105 breaths/minute/L indicating patients likely to be successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. 1

Primary Weaning Indices

  • Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI): The ratio of respiratory frequency to tidal volume (fR/VT) is the most reliable weaning index with the highest area under the ROC curve (0.89) among all indices studied 1

    • Values < 80 breaths/minute/L strongly predict weaning success (likelihood ratio 7.53) 1
    • Values > 100 breaths/minute/L strongly predict weaning failure (likelihood ratio 0.04) 1
    • RSBI should be measured after at least 1-2 minutes of spontaneous breathing, not during the first minute when respiratory drive may still be suppressed 1
  • Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (PI,max): A measure of inspiratory muscle strength 1

    • Values more negative than -30 cm H2O have approximately 80% sensitivity for predicting weaning success 1
    • However, specificity is poor (approximately 25%), limiting its predictive value 1
    • More useful for understanding why a patient failed weaning rather than predicting success 1
  • Minute Ventilation: Traditional threshold of < 10 L/minute 1

    • Poor predictor of weaning outcome (area under ROC curve only 0.40) 1
    • Little better than chance in predicting weaning success 1
  • Oxygenation Parameters:

    • PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio is an unreliable predictor of weaning outcome (area under ROC curve only 0.48) 1
    • Weaning should not be attempted in patients with PaO₂ < 55 mmHg on FiO₂ ≥ 0.40 1

Advanced and Combined Indices

  • Airway Occlusion Pressure (P0.1): Measures respiratory drive 1

    • When combined with RSBI, increases specificity from 0.40 to 0.60 without improving overall accuracy 1
  • Diaphragmatic Ultrasound-Based Indices: More recent developments with improved accuracy 2

    • Diaphragmatic Excursion RSBI (DE-RSBI): Respiratory rate/diaphragmatic excursion
    • Diaphragm Thickening Fraction RSBI (DTF-RSBI): Respiratory rate/diaphragm thickening fraction
    • Both have significantly higher predictive accuracy than traditional RSBI (AUROC 0.813 and 0.859 vs 0.639) 2
  • Weaning Index (WI): A composite index that incorporates RSBI, elastance index, and ventilatory demand 3

    • WI = RSBI × (Peak pressure/NIF) × (Minute ventilation/10)
    • Shows high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (89%) 3

Clinical Application and Considerations

  • Systematic Screening Approach: Daily screening for weaning readiness using multiple parameters improves outcomes 1:

    • PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio ≥ 200
    • PEEP ≤ 5 cm H₂O
    • fR/VT ≤ 105 breaths/minute/L
    • Intact cough on suctioning
    • Absence of sedative or vasopressor infusions
  • Gender and Anatomical Considerations:

    • Women have higher RSBI values than men, which cannot be explained by body size 1
    • Narrow endotracheal tubes (≤ 7 mm internal diameter) in women further increase RSBI, leading to higher false-negative rates 1
  • Measurement Technique Variations:

    • RSBI values are higher when measured on ventilator compared to T-piece trials 4
    • Different threshold values apply depending on measurement method: 75 breaths/min/L for PSV and 100 breaths/min/L for T-piece 4
  • Timing of Measurement:

    • RSBI measured after 30-60 minutes of spontaneous breathing has better predictive value (ROC area 0.92) than when measured during the first minute (ROC area 0.74) 1
  • Clinical Context:

    • RSBI is less helpful when physicians already strongly suspect successful weaning compared to cases with greater uncertainty 1
    • Systematic use of weaning indices results in better patient outcomes than reliance solely on clinical judgment 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.