What is the chance of cure with Whole Pelvic Radiation Therapy (WPRT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer after Radical Prostatectomy (RP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The chance of cure with Whole Pelvic Radiation Therapy (WPRT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is low to moderate, with a reported 6-year biochemical progression-free survival rate of around 32% to 48% in selected patients with low pre-salvage radiation PSA levels [ 1 ].

Key Factors Influencing Cure Rates

  • Pre-salvage radiation PSA level: Lower levels (< 0.5 ng/ml) are associated with better outcomes [ 1 ]
  • Gleason score: Higher scores (8-10) are associated with poorer outcomes [ 1 ]
  • Surgical margins: Positive margins are associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence [ 1 ]
  • PSA doubling time: Shorter doubling times (< 10 months) are associated with poorer outcomes [ 1 ]

Treatment Considerations

  • Salvage radiotherapy: Should be considered for patients with PSA or local recurrence after RP, in the absence of distant metastatic disease [ 1 ]
  • Adjuvant radiotherapy: May be beneficial for patients with adverse pathologic features, such as positive margins or extracapsular extension [ 1 ]
  • Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): May be considered for patients with high-risk features or evidence of metastatic disease [ 1 ]

From the Research

Whole Pelvic Radiation Therapy (WPRT) for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

  • The chance of cure with WPRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is supported by several studies 2, 3, 4, 5.
  • A study published in 2023 found that WPRT improves survival free from relapse, and no recurrences were observed in the pelvis, although the trial was closed early due to poor enrollment 2.
  • Another study from 2007 compared WPRT to prostate bed RT (PBRT) after radical prostatectomy and found that WPRT resulted in superior biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) compared to PBRT, particularly for high-risk patients 3.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2021 found that WPRT significantly improved 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT) 4.
  • A retrospective study from 2024 investigated the use of dose-escalated salvage WPRT with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer and found a 5-year biochemical progression-free survival rate of 72% 5.

Toxicity Associated with WPRT

  • The studies also reported on the toxicity associated with WPRT, including increased risk of acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity 2, 4 and genitourinary (GU) toxicity 4, 5.
  • However, the majority of toxicities were grade 2 or lower, and the incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicities was relatively low 2, 4, 5.

Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Treatment

  • The treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer is a complex and multifaceted issue, and the role of WPRT in this setting is still being defined 6.
  • A study from 2019 noted that oligometastatic prostate cancer may be considered as the last border of possibly curable disease, and that a multimodal approach, including surgery and radiation therapy, may offer opportunities to eradicate the tumor or delay its progression 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.