Diagnosing Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) Infections
ESBL infections are definitively diagnosed through culture and susceptibility testing of appropriate clinical specimens, with specific laboratory tests to detect the presence of ESBL-producing organisms.
Collection of Appropriate Specimens
- Collect representative specimens from the site of infection (at least 1 mL of fluid or tissue, preferably more) and transport to the laboratory in an appropriate transport system 1
- For intra-abdominal infections, peritoneal fluid or pus should be collected in airless sterile syringes or sterile test tubes - peritoneal swabs and fluid from drain tubes are not recommended 1
- For optimal recovery of aerobic bacteria, 1-10 mL of fluid should be inoculated directly into an aerobic blood culture bottle 1
- Send at least 0.5 mL of fluid to the laboratory for Gram stain and fungal cultures if indicated 1
- For anaerobic cultures, at least 0.5 mL of fluid or 0.5 g of tissue should be transported in an anaerobic transport tube, or 1-10 mL of fluid can be inoculated directly into an anaerobic blood culture bottle 1
Laboratory Detection Methods
- ESBL detection is based on the principle that ESBL-producing organisms show enhanced activity against extended-spectrum cephalosporins in the presence of clavulanic acid 2
- Common laboratory methods for ESBL detection include:
- Double disc diffusion test
- Automated systems (e.g., Vitek ESBL test)
- E-tests
- MIC determination
- Molecular/genetic methods 3
When to Suspect ESBL Infections
- Consider ESBL infection in patients with specific risk factors:
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns
- ESBL-producing organisms typically show:
Rapid Diagnostic Approaches
- Rapid molecular identification of microorganisms and their resistance mechanisms from blood cultures can significantly reduce time to appropriate therapy 1
- In patients colonized or potentially infected with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, molecular tests should be adopted as they are associated with more rapid administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- ESBL-producing organisms may appear susceptible to some extended-spectrum cephalosporins in standard testing, but treatment with such antibiotics has been associated with high failure rates 2
- Relying solely on automated susceptibility testing without confirmatory ESBL testing may lead to inappropriate antibiotic selection 2
- According to updated CLSI guidelines, routine ESBL testing is no longer necessary before reporting results when using the new interpretive criteria for cephalosporins 1
- However, ESBL testing remains useful for epidemiological and infection control purposes 1
- Be aware that some ESBL-producing organisms may also express AmpC beta-lactamases, further complicating detection and treatment 6
Clinical Significance
- Identification of ESBL-producing organisms is critical for appropriate antibiotic selection, as these infections are associated with higher mortality, complications, and prolonged hospitalization if not properly treated 1
- Carbapenems are generally considered the drugs of choice for serious infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms 6, 2