Can interventional radiology (IR) stent an iliac artery dissection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Interventional Radiology Treatment of Iliac Artery Dissection

Yes, interventional radiology can effectively stent an iliac artery dissection, particularly flow-limiting dissections and those causing significant symptoms. 1

Indications for Stenting Iliac Dissections

  • Stenting is indicated for flow-limiting iliac artery dissections, especially those causing symptoms such as claudication, rest pain, or limb ischemia 1
  • Provisional stent placement is specifically indicated for iliac arteries as salvage therapy for flow-limiting dissections that occur after balloon angioplasty 2
  • Both chronic atherosclerotic and catheter-induced iliac artery dissections can be effectively treated with endovascular stenting 1

Technical Considerations

  • Technical success rates for stenting iliac artery dissections are excellent, with studies reporting 100% technical success in restoring luminal patency 1
  • For common iliac artery dissections, primary stenting is effective and has strong evidence support (Level of Evidence: B) 2
  • For external iliac artery dissections, stenting is also effective as primary therapy (Level of Evidence: C) 2
  • Translesional pressure gradients should be obtained to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of the dissection before intervention 2

Outcomes and Patency

  • Endovascular treatment of iliac artery dissections shows high patency rates:
    • 97% primary patency at 12 months
    • 90% primary patency at 24 months 1
  • Complete symptom relief is achievable in most patients with catheter-induced dissections 1
  • Endovascular treatment has low periprocedural complications, mortality, and morbidity 3

Case-Specific Considerations

  • Even complex cases such as spontaneous iliac artery dissections extending retrogradely can be successfully treated with stent placement 4
  • For young patients (e.g., 38-year-old) with spontaneous iliac dissection causing acute limb ischemia, self-expandable stents have been used successfully 3

Potential Complications and Pitfalls

  • Stent occlusion can occur during follow-up (reported in approximately 10% of cases over 24 months) 1
  • Careful assessment of outflow vessels is important as poor tibial runoff can decrease durability of the intervention 2
  • Female gender and hormone replacement therapy have been reported to decrease patency of iliac stents 2
  • Endovascular intervention is not indicated if there is no significant pressure gradient across the dissection despite flow augmentation with vasodilators 2

Treatment Algorithm

  1. Confirm hemodynamic significance of the dissection using translesional pressure gradients 2
  2. For flow-limiting dissections in the common iliac artery, primary stenting is the preferred approach 2
  3. For external iliac artery dissections, stenting is also effective 2
  4. Self-expandable or balloon-expandable stents can be used based on the anatomy and location of the dissection 3
  5. Post-stenting, patients should receive appropriate antiplatelet therapy 2
  6. Regular follow-up imaging is recommended to monitor stent patency 1

Interventional radiology treatment of iliac artery dissections represents a minimally invasive approach with high technical success rates and good clinical outcomes, making it the preferred first-line treatment for most symptomatic iliac artery dissections 1, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.