What is the recommended procedure for a hearing test and subsequent treatment for potential hearing loss?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Procedure for Hearing Testing and Treatment of Hearing Loss

The preferred method of hearing assessment is age-appropriate audiologic testing through conventional audiometry or comprehensive audiologic assessment, with subsequent treatment determined by the type and severity of hearing loss identified. 1

Initial Hearing Assessment

For Adults and Children ≥4 Years:

  • Conventional audiometry is appropriate, where the patient raises their hand when a stimulus is heard 1
  • Testing should be performed in a quiet environment using earphones 1
  • Each ear should be tested at 500,1000,2000, and 4000 Hz 1
  • A fail criterion is >20 dB HL at one or more frequencies in either ear 1
  • Pure-tone audiometry remains the gold standard for hearing evaluation in adults 1, 2

For Children 6 Months to 4 Years:

  • Comprehensive audiologic evaluation by an audiologist is recommended 1
  • For children 6 months to 2.5 years: Visual response audiometry is used, where the child associates sound stimuli with reinforcers like lighted toys 1
  • For children 2.5 to 4 years: Play audiometry is used, where the child performs tasks in response to stimulus tones 1
  • Ear-specific testing using insert earphones is recommended whenever possible 1

For Infants <6 Months:

  • Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing is the preferred method 1
  • ABR can be performed in natural sleep up to 3-6 months of age 1
  • For older infants requiring ABR, sedation may be necessary 1

Comprehensive Audiologic Evaluation

A complete audiologic evaluation should include:

  • Thorough hearing-specific case history 3
  • Otoscopic examination 3
  • Ear-specific air and bone conduction threshold measures 3
  • Speech audiometry measures 3
  • Tympanometry to assess middle ear function 1
  • Otoacoustic emission (OAE) measures to determine cochlear function 3

Interpretation of Results

Hearing loss is categorized based on severity:

  • Normal speech: 0-20 dB 1
  • Soft speech/Mild loss: 21-40 dB 1
  • Moderate loss: 41-55 dB 1
  • Moderately-severe loss: 56-70 dB 1
  • Severe or profound loss: 71 dB or higher 1

And by type:

  • Conductive: Outer or middle ear problem 4
  • Sensorineural: Cochlear or auditory nerve problem 4
  • Mixed: Combination of conductive and sensorineural 4

Treatment Recommendations

For Conductive Hearing Loss:

  • Treatment of cerumen impaction with irrigation or curettage if present 2
  • Referral to an otolaryngologist for evaluation and possible surgical intervention 2

For Sensorineural Hearing Loss:

  • Referral to an audiologist for hearing aid evaluation 2
  • For mild to moderate hearing loss: Conventional hearing aids 5
  • For severe to profound hearing loss unresponsive to hearing aids: Consider cochlear implant evaluation 2, 5

For Children with Otitis Media with Effusion (OME):

  • If bilateral OME persists for ≥3 months with documented hearing difficulties, tympanostomy tube insertion should be offered 1
  • Any child with hearing loss detected prior to tympanostomy tube insertion should have postoperative testing to confirm resolution 1

Special Considerations

  • Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (≥30 dB loss within 72 hours) requires prompt otolaryngology referral 2
  • Asymmetric hearing loss (>15 dB difference between ears) requires further evaluation, possibly including imaging 3, 4
  • For patients with persistent symptoms, re-examination at 3-6 month intervals is recommended until resolution or additional intervention 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on tuning fork tests for clinical screening due to insufficient accuracy 3
  • Developmental abnormalities or behavioral problems may preclude accurate results on routine audiometric screening; refer these patients to specialists with appropriate equipment and expertise 1
  • Do not order routine laboratory tests for sudden hearing loss unless specific risk factors are present 3
  • Do not overlook the importance of post-intervention hearing testing to confirm resolution or identify persistent issues 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Audiometric Testing for Suspected Hearing Loss with Lightheadedness

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Audiometry and other hearing tests.

Handbook of clinical neurology, 2016

Research

New treatment options for hearing loss.

Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.