Doublets in Medical Treatment: Applications in Cancer Therapy
Doublets are combination chemotherapy regimens consisting of two drugs used primarily for treating various cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, with evidence showing improved survival outcomes compared to single-agent therapy in specific patient populations.
Doublets in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Elderly Patients with NSCLC
- Doublet chemotherapy regimens have shown significant benefits in elderly patients (70-79 years) with stage IV NSCLC who have good performance status and limited comorbidities 1
- The combination of monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel is specifically recommended for this population, showing improved overall survival compared to single-agent therapy 1
- In the IFCT-0501 trial, carboplatin plus paclitaxel demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (10.3 months vs. 6.2 months) compared to single-agent therapy with either vinorelbine or gemcitabine 1
Types of Doublets in NSCLC
- Platinum-based doublets:
- Non-platinum doublets:
Efficacy Considerations
- Platinum-based doublets generally show better efficacy than non-platinum doublets:
- Response rates are typically higher with doublet therapy compared to single agents 2
Doublets in Colorectal Cancer
BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- The doublet combination of encorafenib plus cetuximab is now considered the standard of care for second- and third-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer 1
- This doublet regimen was approved by the FDA and European Commission in 2020 for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer after prior therapy 1
- The BEACON CRC study demonstrated that encorafenib plus cetuximab significantly improved overall survival compared to control regimens (median OS 9.3 months vs. 5.9 months) 1
Doublets vs. Triplets in Cancer Treatment
Comparison in Colorectal Cancer
- In BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, the addition of binimetinib to the encorafenib/cetuximab doublet (creating a triplet) showed similar efficacy but added toxicity 1
- Both doublet and triplet regimens significantly improved survival compared to standard therapy, but the doublet is generally preferred due to similar efficacy with less toxicity 1
Comparison in Multiple Myeloma
- Meta-analysis of triplet vs. doublet regimens in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma showed triplets improved overall survival (HR 0.83) and progression-free survival (HR 0.68) 4
- However, triplet regimens were associated with higher rates of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to doublets 4
Safety Considerations
- Toxicity profiles differ between platinum and non-platinum doublets:
- In elderly patients, doublet therapy is associated with increased toxicity compared to single-agent therapy, requiring careful patient selection 1
Clinical Decision Making
- For elderly NSCLC patients (70-79 years):
- For BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer:
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Not all doublets are equally effective - platinum-based doublets generally show better efficacy than non-platinum doublets in NSCLC 3
- Patient selection is crucial - age alone should not preclude doublet therapy, but comorbidities and performance status should be considered 1
- Increased toxicity with doublets must be balanced against potential survival benefits 1, 2
- In some cancers like cervical carcinoma, non-platinum doublets may be preferred for patients previously treated with platinum-based therapy due to potential resistance 5