What is the most common complication of surgically-assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Most Common Complication of Surgically-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE)

The most common complication of surgically-assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) is transient neurosensitive deficit, specifically hypoesthesia of the lower lip, which does not typically affect patients' quality of life. 1

Prevalence of Complications in SARPE

SARPE is generally considered a procedure with minimal patient morbidity, but it is not without risks. Studies have shown various complication rates:

  • Overall complication rates vary by appliance type, with tooth-borne appliances having a 17.2% complication rate, bone-borne appliances 66.7%, and orthodontic mini-implant-borne appliances 15.4% 2
  • In a large retrospective study of 120 patients, 41 patients (34.2%) developed at least one complication 3
  • In another study of 55 patients, 28 patients (50.9%) presented with one or more complications 4

Neurosensitive Complications

  • Transient anesthesia of the cheek and chin area occurs in virtually all patients immediately after surgery 1
  • Residual neurosensitive deficit (hypoesthesia of the lower lip) is the most common persistent complication 1
  • Injury to the infraorbital nerve was observed in 16 out of 55 patients (29.1%) in one study 4

Other Common Complications

Skeletal/Expansion-Related Complications

  • Asymmetric and/or inadequate expansion was found in 13.3% of patients in one large cohort study, making it the most frequent surgical complication in that population 3
  • Relapse is common, with studies showing varying rates:
    • Tooth-borne appliances: 1.44 mm (7.18%) relapse at the premolar level 2, 5
    • Bone-borne appliances: 0.76 mm relapse 2
    • Orthodontic mini-implant-borne appliances: 0.27 mm relapse 2

Dental and Periodontal Complications

  • Gingival recession was reported in 8.3% of patients in one study, making it the most common dental complication 3
  • Dental complications including damage to teeth were seen in 5 out of 55 patients (9.1%) in another study 4
  • Buccal attachment loss (0.6 ± 0.5 mm) has been observed, particularly in female subjects 6
  • Severe periodontal complications are rare but can be catastrophic - two patients in one study developed severe periodontal bone defects resulting in loss of central incisors 3

Other Significant Complications

  • Postoperative hemorrhage was observed in 6 out of 55 patients (10.9%) 4
  • Severe postoperative pain requiring additional management was reported in 4 out of 55 patients (7.3%) 4
  • Perforation of the palate has been reported 1
  • Maxillary pseudarthrosis can occur 1
  • Malocclusion and dysgnathia due to mandibular deficiencies have been documented 1

Risk Factors and Prevention

  • Eccentric interdental osteotomies can cause separation of bone from the root surface of central incisors, predisposing to periodontal defects 3
  • Postoperative osteotomy site infections increase the risk of periodontal complications 3
  • Careful patient selection and planning are essential to minimize complications 4

Clinical Implications

  • Despite the occurrence of complications, most are mild and transient 4
  • Prolonged hospital stay was necessary in 6 out of 55 patients (10.9%) in one study 4
  • Additional surgery was required in only 2 out of 55 cases (3.6%) 4
  • Most patients tolerate the neurosensitive changes well, with minimal impact on quality of life 1

In summary, while SARPE is generally considered safe, clinicians should be aware of the range of potential complications, with neurosensitive deficits being the most common persistent issue that patients may experience.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Is There a Significant Difference in Relapse and Complication Rate of Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Using Tooth-Borne, Bone-Borne, and Orthodontic Mini-Implant-Borne Appliances?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2021

Research

Complications following surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a retrospective cohort study.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2012

Research

Stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion with and without retention analyzed by 3-dimensional imaging.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.