Can SGLT-1 (sodium-glucose linked transporter 1) inhibitors be used as a treatment for type 1 diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SGLT-1 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes: Not FDA-Approved and Carry Significant DKA Risk

SGLT-1 inhibitors are not FDA-approved for use in type 1 diabetes and carry a significant risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), including euglycemic DKA, which outweighs potential benefits in most cases. 1

Current Status and Regulatory Position

  • SGLT inhibitors (including SGLT-1, SGLT-2, and dual SGLT-1/2 inhibitors) are not FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes, despite showing some glycemic benefits 1
  • While sotagliflozin (a dual SGLT-1/2 inhibitor) received approval in the EU for specific type 1 diabetes patients with BMI ≥27 kg/m², it has not received FDA approval in the US 2
  • Clinical trials have shown modest benefits, but these are outweighed by safety concerns, particularly the risk of DKA 1

Potential Benefits in Type 1 Diabetes

  • Modest improvements in glycemic control with A1C reductions of 0.2-0.5% 3, 4, 5
  • Reduction in insulin requirements (approximately 32% reduction in bolus insulin dose in some studies) 4
  • Weight loss benefits (1.7 kg reduction compared to 0.5 kg gain with placebo in one study) 4
  • Increased time in target glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) 4
  • Potential cardio-renal benefits similar to those seen in type 2 diabetes 5

Significant Risks and Concerns

  • Increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), including euglycemic DKA (occurring without significantly elevated blood glucose) 1
  • DKA risk is 5-17 times higher in type 1 diabetes patients treated with SGLT inhibitors compared to those not on these medications 1
  • The FDA has issued a specific warning about the risk of euglycemic DKA with SGLT inhibitors 1
  • Up to one-third of DKA cases present with glucose levels <200 mg/dL, making detection challenging 1
  • Increased risk of urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis (RR 2.27) compared to other adjunctive therapies 5

Risk Mitigation Strategies

  • If considering off-label use (not recommended), implement strict ketone monitoring protocols 1
  • Educate patients about signs and symptoms of DKA (dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain) 1
  • Instruct patients to immediately stop taking SGLT inhibitors and seek medical attention if DKA symptoms develop 1
  • Avoid use during periods of increased DKA risk: illness, reduced food intake, dehydration, alcohol consumption 1
  • Consider alternative adjunctive therapies with better safety profiles for type 1 diabetes 1

Alternative Adjunctive Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes

  • Pramlintide is FDA-approved for use in adults with type 1 diabetes, with modest A1C reductions (0-0.3%) and weight benefits (1-2 kg) 1
  • Metformin may provide small reductions in weight and lipid levels but does not significantly improve A1C in type 1 diabetes 1
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists show modest A1C reductions (0.2-0.5%) with significant weight loss benefits (approximately 3 kg) and lower DKA risk compared to SGLT inhibitors 1, 5

Conclusion

Despite potential benefits in glycemic control, insulin dose reduction, and weight management, SGLT-1 inhibitors pose a significant risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in type 1 diabetes patients. Current guidelines and FDA warnings do not support their routine use in type 1 diabetes management, and insulin therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.