Management of Mitral Valve Prolapse Complications
The management of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) complications should be stratified based on severity, with surgical intervention strongly recommended for symptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), while asymptomatic patients with mild MVP require only regular monitoring. 1
Stratification and Monitoring
- MVP should be classified into stages: Stage A (mild MVP with normal coaptation and no MR), Stage B (progressive MVP with mild-to-moderate MR), Stage C (severe MVP with loss of coaptation or flail leaflet and severe MR), and Stage D (symptomatic severe MVP with MR) 2
- Asymptomatic patients with mild MR require clinical follow-up every 12 months with echocardiography every 2 years 1
- Patients with moderate MR should have clinical follow-up every 6 months with annual echocardiography 1
- Asymptomatic patients with severe MR should have clinical evaluation every 6 months with annual echocardiography 1
Management of Specific Complications
Severe Mitral Regurgitation
- Surgery is recommended for symptomatic patients with severe MR 1
- Surgery should be considered in asymptomatic patients with severe MR if any of the following are present: left ventricular dysfunction, new onset atrial fibrillation, or pulmonary hypertension 1
- Mitral valve repair is strongly preferred over replacement when technically feasible 1
- For patients at high surgical risk, percutaneous edge-to-edge repair may be considered 1
Arrhythmias
- Beta-blockers are the first-line treatment for ventricular arrhythmias associated with MVP 3
- Anticoagulant therapy with target INR between 2-3 is recommended for patients with permanent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, history of systemic embolism, or evidence of left atrial thrombus 1
Infectious Endocarditis
- Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended prior to dental treatment or surgery in patients with MVP who have a pansystolic or end-systolic murmur 4, 3
Thromboembolic Events
- Anti-platelet aggregation agents are recommended for patients with MVP who have experienced transient ischemic attacks or cerebral ischemic episodes 4, 3
- Anticoagulants should be considered in recurrent cases 4
Surgical Management Considerations
Different surgical techniques are available based on the specific MVP pathology 5:
- Nonresection techniques using PTFE neochord reconstruction or chordal transfer for focal leaflet flail or bileaflet prolapse 5
- Focal triangular resection with annuloplasty ring for focal leaflet flail 5
- Sliding leaflet valvuloplasty with annuloplasty ring for diffuse posterior leaflet myxomatous disease 5
Outcomes depend significantly on surgeon experience and center volume 1
For patients with ruptured chordae tendinae causing acute severe MR, prompt surgical repair is required 3
Medical Therapy
- There is no evidence supporting the use of vasodilators, including ACE inhibitors, in chronic MR without heart failure 1
- ACE inhibitors should be used in patients with advanced MR and severe symptoms who are not surgical candidates 1
- Beta-blockers and spironolactone should be considered for heart failure management 1
Special Considerations for Non-Cardiac Surgery
- For patients with MVP requiring non-cardiac surgery, anesthetic management should be tailored to the severity of MVP 2:
- Stage A (mild MVP without MR): Standard spinal anesthesia technique is appropriate 2
- Stage B (MVP with mild-to-moderate MR): Gradual induction of spinal anesthesia and maintaining adequate preload with fluid management 2
- Stages C and D (MVP with severe MR): Consider alternative anesthetic techniques, maintain higher than normal preload, and avoid tachycardia 2
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to recognize the severity of MVP and associated MR before anesthesia can lead to complications 2
- Neglecting regular follow-up in asymptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe MR 1
- Delaying surgical intervention in patients with severe symptomatic MR, which can lead to irreversible left ventricular dysfunction 1
- Underestimating the importance of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with significant MR 4, 3