What is the role of C (connecting) peptide levels in diagnosing and managing diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of C-peptide in Diagnosing and Managing Diabetes

C-peptide testing is primarily indicated in insulin-treated patients to help differentiate between diabetes types when clinical presentation is ambiguous, with values <200 pmol/L consistent with type 1 diabetes, 200-600 pmol/L suggesting type 1 or MODY, and >600 pmol/L indicating type 2 diabetes. 1, 2

When to Use C-peptide Testing

  • C-peptide testing should be reserved for insulin-treated patients where diabetes classification is unclear, not as a routine test for most people with diabetes 3
  • C-peptide measurement is particularly valuable after 3-5 years from diagnosis when persistence of substantial insulin secretion suggests type 2 or monogenic diabetes rather than type 1 4
  • A random C-peptide sample within 5 hours of eating can replace formal stimulation tests for classification purposes 1, 2
  • C-peptide testing should not be performed within 2 weeks of a hyperglycemic emergency as results may be unreliable 1, 2

Interpretation of C-peptide Results

  • Values <200 pmol/L (<0.6 ng/mL) are consistent with type 1 diabetes 2
  • Values between 200-600 pmol/L (0.6-1.8 ng/mL) usually indicate type 1 diabetes or maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), but may occur in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, particularly in people with normal/low BMI or after long disease duration 1
  • Values >600 pmol/L (>1.8 ng/mL) suggest type 2 diabetes 1, 2
  • Very low levels (<80 pmol/L or <0.24 ng/mL) do not need to be repeated and confirm absolute insulin deficiency 1

Practical Testing Considerations

  • If C-peptide is <600 pmol/L and concurrent glucose is <4 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) or the person may have been fasting, consider repeating the test 1
  • For insulin-treated patients, C-peptide must be measured prior to insulin discontinuation to exclude severe insulin deficiency 1, 2
  • When the result is >600 pmol/L (>1.8 ng/mL), the circumstances of testing (fasting vs. non-fasting) do not matter 1

Clinical Applications of C-peptide Testing

  • Helps distinguish between type 1 and type 2 diabetes in ambiguous cases, such as individuals with type 2 phenotype presenting with ketoacidosis 2, 3
  • Confirms absolute insulin requirement regardless of apparent etiology when C-peptide is absent 4
  • Assists in identifying MODY, where persistence of C-peptide is an important clinical feature 5
  • Can help identify LADA (Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults), which presents clinically like type 2 diabetes but with positive pancreatic autoantibodies and lower C-peptide levels 5
  • May be used for patient selection for islet cell transplantation and post-transplant monitoring 5

C-peptide as a Marker of Beta Cell Function

  • C-peptide is produced in equal amounts to insulin but is not extracted by the liver, making it a more accurate reflection of endogenous insulin secretion than insulin itself 4, 6
  • Postprandial C-peptide to glucose ratio may better reflect maximum beta cell secretory capacity compared to fasting measurements 6
  • Beta cell dysfunction is a core deficit in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with residual beta cell function being a key factor in achieving optimal glycemic control 6

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • C-peptide levels may be misleading if measured during or shortly after a hyperglycemic emergency (wait at least 2 weeks) 1, 2
  • In type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance is a major confounder that limits the utility of C-peptide measurement 7
  • Standardization issues between different laboratories may affect the comparability of C-peptide measurements 7
  • Low C-peptide in a patient initially diagnosed with type 2 diabetes may indicate misdiagnosis and the need to reclassify as type 1 diabetes 5
  • High uncorrected fasting C-peptide in the presence of hyperglycemia may suggest insulin resistance rather than good beta cell function 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

C-peptide Testing for Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Assessing Endogenous Insulin Production with Urinary C-peptide to Creatinine Ratio

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013

Research

[The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in diabetology].

Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.