What infections are not covered by tigecycline, particularly in cases of bacteremia caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Tigecycline Should Not Be Used for VRE Bacteremia Due to Poor Plasma Concentrations

Tigecycline should not be used for treating bacteremia caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) due to its large volume of distribution and resulting low serum levels. 1, 2

Infections Not Covered by Tigecycline

Bloodstream Infections

  • Tigecycline performs poorly in bacteremic patients due to poor plasma concentrations, with a much higher risk of failing to clear bacteremia 1
  • For VRE bacteremia specifically, tigecycline is contraindicated due to its large volume of distribution and low serum levels 1, 2
  • High-dose daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg/day) alone or in combination with β-lactams is recommended instead for VRE bacteremia 1, 2
  • Linezolid is another preferred option for VRE bloodstream infections with clinical cure rates of 81.4% 1, 3

Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia

  • Tigecycline should not be considered as first-line therapy in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia 1
  • The drug's pharmacokinetic properties result in suboptimal concentrations in lung tissue for treating pneumonia effectively 1

Appropriate Uses of Tigecycline for VRE

Despite its limitations for bacteremia, tigecycline is effective for certain VRE infections:

  • Tigecycline is recommended as the drug of choice for intra-abdominal infections caused by VRE 1, 2
  • For polymicrobial infections involving VRE, tigecycline is appropriate treatment with a loading dose of 100 mg IV followed by 50 mg IV every 12 hours 1, 2
  • A retrospective study reported an overall success rate of 97.6% when using tigecycline for various VRE infections, particularly intra-abdominal infections 1

Alternative Treatments for VRE Infections

When tigecycline is not appropriate, these alternatives should be considered:

  • Linezolid 600 mg IV or PO every 12 hours is strongly recommended for VRE infections, including bacteremia 1
  • High-dose daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg/day) alone or in combination with β-lactams is recommended for VRE bacteremia 1
  • For uncomplicated urinary tract infections due to VRE, options include fosfomycin 3g PO single dose, nitrofurantoin 100 mg PO every 6 hours, or high-dose ampicillin (18-30g IV daily in divided doses) 1

Clinical Implications and Outcomes

  • Inappropriate antibiotic therapy for VRE bacteremia significantly impacts mortality rates 4
  • The 30-day mortality rate for patients with VRE bacteremia treated with inappropriate antibiotics was 54% compared to 26% for those treated with appropriate antibiotics 4
  • Median survival for patients treated with inappropriate antibiotics was only 1 month compared to 11 months for those receiving appropriate antibiotics 4
  • Using tigecycline for VRE bacteremia would be considered inappropriate therapy due to its pharmacokinetic limitations 1, 2

Susceptibility Testing Considerations

  • When evaluating treatment options for VRE, reliable susceptibility testing is essential 5
  • Broth microdilution is the gold standard for determining susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline against VRE 5
  • Agreement between broth microdilution and Etest for tigecycline susceptibility testing has been reported as suboptimal 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Tigecycline Effectiveness Against Enterococcus Bacteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia pharmacotherapy.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.