What are the indications for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

ERCP is primarily indicated for therapeutic interventions, while MRCP is preferred for diagnostic purposes due to its non-invasive nature and lower risk of complications, as supported by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) clinical guideline 1.

Indications for ERCP and MRCP

The indications for ERCP and MRCP can be summarized as follows:

  • ERCP is indicated for:
    • Therapeutic interventions, such as removal of common bile duct stones, placement of biliary stents, management of bile leaks, and treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
    • Diagnostic purposes when less invasive methods are inconclusive
  • MRCP is indicated for:
    • Purely diagnostic purposes, such as evaluating suspected choledocholithiasis, identifying biliary strictures, assessing pancreatic duct abnormalities, diagnosing primary sclerosing cholangitis, and evaluating congenital anomalies of the biliary tree
    • Initial diagnosis, with ERCP reserved for cases requiring intervention or when MRCP is contraindicated or unavailable

Clinical Scenario Considerations

The choice between ERCP and MRCP depends on the clinical scenario, with consideration of the risks and benefits of each procedure. ERCP carries risks including pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, and infection, with a mortality risk of 0.4% 1. In contrast, MRCP is a non-invasive procedure with no risk of these complications.

Guideline Recommendations

The ESGE and EASL recommend that MRCP should be preferred over ERCP as the primary diagnostic modality for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) 1. ERCP can be considered if MRCP is equivocal or contraindicated, but the risks of ERCP must be weighed against the potential benefits.

Recent Evidence

A recent study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology in 2019 supports the use of MRCP as the initial diagnostic modality for jaundice, with ERCP reserved for therapeutic interventions 1. The study highlights the importance of considering the risks and benefits of each procedure in the clinical scenario.

Conclusion Not Applicable - Outcome Based Answer Only

The primary consideration in choosing between ERCP and MRCP should be the minimization of morbidity, mortality, and improvement of quality of life, with MRCP generally preferred for initial diagnosis and ERCP reserved for cases requiring intervention or when MRCP is contraindicated or unavailable, as supported by the highest quality and most recent evidence 1.

From the Research

Indications for ERCP

  • The clinical indications to perform ERCP in patients with pancreatic cancer may include palliative stent placement in patients with known non-resectable pancreatic carcinoma invading the common bile duct; obtaining tissue material in patients with atypical masses in the pancreatic head, particularly in the periampullary area; suspicion of intraductal neoplasm; difficult differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis 2
  • Indications for urgent (<24 h) ERCP include severe acute cholangitis, acute biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis, biliary or pancreatic leaks, in the absence of percutaneous drainage, and severe acute cholecystitis in patients who are unfit for surgery and do not respond to conservative management 3
  • ERCP is very useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients with suspected CBD stones, with elevated liver function tests and dilated CBD by ultrasound being the most accurate predictors of stones 4
  • ESGE recommends the combination of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) and ERCP-based tissue acquisition as the preferred diagnostic approach for tissue acquisition in patients with jaundice and distal extrahepatic biliary stricture in the absence of a pancreatic mass 5

Indications for MRCP

  • The main indication for MRCP imaging was in evaluation of common bile duct obstruction, with aim of present the level, and its cause 2
  • MRCP has the potential to replace or at least precede ERCP as the first-line imaging effort in the evaluation of suspected biliary obstruction 6
  • MRCP is a unique noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of biliary obstruction, and is well suited to provide the information required to plan the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients 6

Comparison of ERCP and MRCP

  • ERCP is an operator-dependent and invasive procedure that is associated with complications and limitations, while MRCP is a non-invasive technique 2, 6
  • The place for ERCP in future will be reserved for interventional procedures, with MRCP being used for diagnostic purposes 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.