Laboratory Tests and Imaging Studies to Detect Prostate Cancer Spread
The most comprehensive approach to determine if prostate cancer has spread includes PSA testing, bone scan, CT/MRI of abdomen and pelvis, and PSMA PET/CT imaging when available, as these provide the highest diagnostic accuracy for detecting metastatic disease.
Initial Laboratory Tests
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most sensitive and clinically useful method for monitoring patients following definitive therapy for prostate cancer. A detectable value following radical prostatectomy or an increasing level following radiation therapy indicates recurrent or residual disease 1
- Complete blood count and chemistry profile, including alkaline phosphatase, should be performed as part of the initial workup to assess for the presence of regional or distant metastases 2
- Elevated alkaline phosphatase may indicate bone metastases and should prompt further investigation with bone imaging 2
Imaging Studies for Metastatic Spread
Standard Imaging Approach
- Chest radiograph or CT scan should be performed to evaluate for lung metastases 2
- Bone scan is indicated in patients with:
- CT or MRI scan of the abdomen and pelvis should be performed to assess:
- Abdominal and pelvic CT scan is specifically recommended for patients with:
Advanced Imaging Techniques
- PSMA PET/CT is now recommended as the preferred imaging modality when available, particularly for high-risk disease 2
- PSMA PET/CT has significantly higher accuracy than conventional imaging for detecting:
Pattern of Spread Assessment
- Prostate cancer spread should be classified according to the following patterns 2:
- Locally recurrent disease in the prostate or prostate bed
- Nodal spread within the pelvis (lymph nodes >1.0 cm)
- Nodal spread beyond the pelvis
- Bone disease with or without nodal disease
- Visceral disease (lung, liver, adrenal, or CNS sites) 2
Molecular and Biomarker Testing
- Molecular biomarkers in metastatic lesions can be assessed through:
- Tumor sequencing may reveal actionable mutations that can guide treatment decisions 2
- Testing for mutations in genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 may have implications for treatment and genetic counseling 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- CT scans, ultrasound, and MRI cannot always accurately predict the true depth of local invasion 2
- Conventional imaging (CT and bone scan) has limited sensitivity for detecting small metastases 2
- A single negative imaging study does not definitively rule out metastatic disease, especially with high clinical suspicion 3
- The rate of increase in serum PSA can help distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease 1
- Time interval between different imaging modalities should ideally be less than 1 month to avoid heterogeneity in results 4
Algorithm for Metastatic Workup Based on Risk
For intermediate-risk disease (particularly with Gleason grade group 3):
- Cross-sectional abdominopelvic imaging
- Bone scan
- PSMA PET/CT if available 2
For high-risk localized or locally advanced disease:
- PSMA PET/CT (preferred if available)
- At minimum: cross-sectional abdominopelvic imaging and bone scan 2
For suspected recurrence after treatment:
- PSA monitoring (rate of rise helps distinguish local vs. distant recurrence)
- PSMA PET/CT when available
- CT/MRI for abdominal/pelvic lymph nodes
- Bone scan for skeletal assessment 1