What is the purpose of the bubble study in an echocardiogram (echo)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Purpose of Bubble Study in Echocardiography

The primary purpose of a bubble study (saline contrast echocardiography) is to detect intracardiac or intrapulmonary shunts, particularly patent foramen ovale (PFO) and pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs). 1

How Bubble Studies Work

  • Agitated saline containing microbubbles is injected intravenously while performing echocardiography 1
  • The timing of bubble appearance in the left heart chambers helps differentiate between types of shunts:
    • Bubbles appearing within the first 3-4 cardiac cycles after right atrial opacification suggest an intracardiac shunt (like PFO) 2
    • Bubbles appearing after the 5th cardiac cycle suggest an intrapulmonary shunt (like PAVM) 2

Clinical Applications

Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO)

  • Essential for evaluating cryptogenic stroke patients, where PFO may be a potential cause of paradoxical embolism 1, 3
  • Helps identify patients who might benefit from PFO closure to prevent recurrent stroke 1
  • Particularly important in younger stroke patients (≤60 years) with no other identifiable stroke etiology 4

Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension

  • Helps identify intracardiac shunts that may contribute to or complicate pulmonary hypertension 1
  • Assists in risk stratification of pulmonary embolism patients, as PFO presence increases risk of death, stroke, and peripheral arterial embolism 1
  • Guides therapeutic decisions in pulmonary hypertension management 1

Assessment of Congenital Heart Disease

  • Verifies the presence of shunts in known or suspected congenital heart disease 1
  • Differentiates between intracardiac and extracardiac shunts 1
  • Complements standard echocardiography in evaluating complex congenital heart defects 1

Evaluation for Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations

  • Helps diagnose pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, particularly in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia 1
  • Transthoracic echocardiography with contrast has 98-99% sensitivity for detecting PAVMs 1

Technical Considerations

  • Bubble studies can be performed during both transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography 1
  • TEE provides higher sensitivity (51% vs. 32%) for detecting shunts compared to TTE 1
  • 3D echocardiography may have higher sensitivity for diagnosing intrapulmonary shunts compared to 2D (61% vs. 36%) 2
  • The optimal cutoff for differentiating PFO from intrapulmonary shunts is the 4th cardiac cycle (bubbles appearing by 4th cycle suggest PFO, after 5th cycle suggest intrapulmonary shunt) 2

Safety Considerations

  • Bubble studies are generally safe but rare complications can occur 5
  • Cerebral ischemic events have been reported during or shortly after bubble studies, particularly in patients with right-to-left shunts 5
  • Complication rate is approximately 0.1%, warranting informed consent 3
  • Patients with known large right-to-left shunts should be monitored carefully during the procedure 5

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Avoid performing bubble studies in patients with established stroke etiologies where findings won't change management 3, 4
  • Be aware that PFO detection in patients with other stroke risk factors may represent an incidental finding rather than the cause 3
  • Recognize that bubble studies performed in non-cryptogenic stroke patients rarely lead to changes in management 4
  • Understand that false positives and false negatives can occur, requiring careful interpretation 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.