Are Native Americans considered high risk for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and eligible for a second dose of nirsevimab (Monoclonal antibody against RSV)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Native Americans Are Considered High Risk for RSV and Eligible for a Second Dose of Nirsevimab

Yes, American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) children are explicitly considered high risk for severe RSV disease and are eligible for a second dose of nirsevimab when entering their second RSV season (at 8-19 months of age). 1

Evidence Supporting High-Risk Designation

  • Research shows that some AI/AN children experience significantly higher rates of severe RSV disease, with RSV-associated hospitalization rates 4-10 times higher than similar-aged children across multiple US sites 1
  • Historical data documented bronchiolitis hospitalization rates of 91.3-96.3/1000 infants in Navajo populations, similar to rates seen in other high-risk groups like preterm infants and those with chronic lung disease 1
  • Alaska Native infants in southwestern Alaska experience higher RSV hospitalization rates and a longer RSV season compared to the general US population 1
  • Some AI/AN communities live in remote regions, making transportation of children with severe RSV more challenging, which compounds the risk 1

Eligibility Criteria for Second Dose of Nirsevimab

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) specifically includes AI/AN children in their recommendations for nirsevimab administration during the second RSV season:

  • AI/AN children aged 8-19 months entering their second RSV season are explicitly listed as eligible for nirsevimab 1
  • This recommendation appears in the official ACIP guidance box listing high-risk groups eligible for nirsevimab in their second RSV season 1

Administration Considerations

  • The timing of nirsevimab administration should align with the local RSV season 1
  • For AI/AN children in Alaska, where RSV seasonality is less predictable and often longer than the national average, providers should consult state or local guidance on timing 1
  • Nirsevimab can be administered simultaneously with other routine childhood vaccines, following general best practices for immunization 1

Clinical Impact and Rationale

  • RSV infection in infancy is associated with increased risk of chronic respiratory conditions, including wheezing, lower respiratory infections, and chronic productive cough that may persist to 5-8 years of age 2
  • Native American populations have historically experienced disproportionately high morbidity and mortality from various infectious diseases 3
  • Replacing palivizumab with nirsevimab for eligible children entering their second RSV season is expected to be cost-saving while maintaining protection 1
  • A single dose of nirsevimab has demonstrated efficacy in protecting infants from medically attended RSV lower respiratory tract infections (79.5% relative risk reduction) and associated hospitalizations (77.3% relative risk reduction) 4

Important Considerations

  • Nirsevimab is contraindicated in persons with a history of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) after a previous dose or to a product component 1
  • When administering nirsevimab to children with increased risk for bleeding, providers should follow ACIP's general best practice guidelines for immunization 1
  • Adverse reactions should be reported to MedWatch, as FDA has classified nirsevimab as a drug 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.