Kanavel Signs: Diagnostic Criteria for Pyogenic Flexor Tenosynovitis
The Kanavel signs are four clinical findings used to diagnose pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT), consisting of: tenderness along the flexor tendon sheath, symmetric finger swelling, pain with passive extension, and a semi-flexed posture of the affected digit. 1
The Four Kanavel Signs
Tenderness along the flexor tendon sheath: Exquisite tenderness over the course of the flexor tendon sheath, particularly at the A1 pulley
Symmetric finger swelling: Uniform swelling of the entire digit rather than localized swelling
- This differs from other finger infections which often present with more localized swelling 1
Pain with passive extension: Significant pain when the examiner attempts to extend the affected finger
Semi-flexed posture: The affected finger is held in slight flexion at rest
Diagnostic Value and Limitations
Individual Kanavel signs have excellent sensitivity (91.4-97.1%) but poor specificity (51.3-69.2%) 1
The most predictive combination includes:
- Tenderness along the flexor tendon sheath
- Pain with passive extension
- Duration of symptoms less than 5 days 1
When these three factors are combined in a prediction algorithm, the diagnostic accuracy is significantly improved (area under ROC curve of 0.91) 1
Recent Modifications and Improvements
A1 pulley tenderness: A 2022 study found that specifically assessing tenderness at the A1 pulley (rather than the entire sheath) improves diagnostic specificity 2
- When A1 pulley tenderness is added to the traditional Kanavel signs, there is increased specificity and diagnostic accuracy 2
Imaging adjuncts: Contrast-enhanced CT can provide objective measurements to support diagnosis
Clinical Implications
The number of positive Kanavel signs correlates with disease severity
- Patients with surgically confirmed PFT typically present with more Kanavel signs (average 2.9) compared to those with simple cellulitis (average 0.5) 3
Duration of symptoms is important for treatment decisions
False positives can occur with other inflammatory conditions of the hand, so clinical context remains important 1, 4