MR Enteroclysis: Technique and Working Mechanism
MR enteroclysis is a specialized MRI-based examination that uses a nasoduodenal tube for controlled distention of the small bowel with infused contrast media to achieve optimal visualization of bowel pathology. 1
Technical Components and Procedure
- MR enteroclysis requires placement of a nasoduodenal tube to allow controlled and active distention of the small bowel 1
- Typically, 1.5-2 liters of biphasic enteral contrast (low signal on T1-weighted and high signal on T2-weighted images) is infused through the tube 1, 2
- Intravenous contrast (gadolinium) is typically administered during the examination to enhance visualization of bowel wall and extraluminal pathology 1
- The procedure includes specialized MRI sequences:
- MR fluoroscopy can be performed during the examination to monitor the filling process and evaluate motility disorders or low-grade stenosis 4, 3
Advantages and Performance
- MR enteroclysis provides excellent diagnostic performance for small bowel evaluation, at least equivalent to MR enterography 1
- It offers statistically better detection of superficial mucosal abnormalities compared to MR enterography, though shows no difference for stenoses and fistulas 1
- The technique accurately displays transmural abnormalities characteristic of Crohn's disease:
- It can effectively detect the number and extent of involved small bowel segments and identify luminal narrowing or prestenotic intestinal dilatation 2, 3
- MR enteroclysis avoids radiation exposure, making it suitable for follow-up studies and monitoring disease activity 2, 5
Clinical Applications
- Primary applications include:
- It is particularly valuable for:
Limitations and Considerations
- The invasive nature with nasoduodenal tube insertion and active contrast infusion makes it less favorable from a patient perspective 1
- Not typically suitable for acutely ill patients who may not tolerate the tube placement and contrast infusion 1
- Patients with significant acute flares or complications may poorly tolerate the procedure 1
- MR enteroclysis is not widely utilized compared to MR enterography, which has become more common in clinical practice 1, 6
- The technique requires specialized expertise and equipment 1
Comparison with MR Enterography
- The key difference is the method of bowel distention: active distention via nasoduodenal tube in enteroclysis versus oral ingestion in enterography 1
- Both techniques have similar capabilities for evaluating mucosal healing and assessing strictures for active disease versus fibrosis 1
- MR enterography is generally preferred due to being less invasive, though it may provide less optimal distention of the proximal small bowel 1, 5
- MR enteroclysis may be preferred when active distention is needed to confirm mild strictures without proximal dilation 1