Why is urinary cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) defective in Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1 (PHP1) and normal in Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 2 (PHP2)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differences in Urinary cAMP Response Between Pseudohypoparathyroidism Type 1 and Type 2

In pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1 (PHP1), urinary cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) excretion is defective in response to parathyroid hormone (PTH), while in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 2 (PHP2), urinary cAMP response is normal despite PTH resistance. This key difference reflects their distinct molecular pathophysiology.

Molecular Basis of the Difference

  • PHP1 is characterized by a defect in the Gsα-adenylyl cyclase pathway, specifically involving mutations or epigenetic alterations in GNAS, which encodes the α subunit of the stimulatory G protein (Gsα) 1
  • In PHP1, the defective Gsα protein fails to properly activate adenylyl cyclase, preventing the normal production of cAMP in response to PTH binding to its receptor 2
  • This molecular defect results in the inability to increase urinary cAMP excretion following PTH administration, which serves as a diagnostic marker for PHP1 2
  • PHP2, in contrast, has a normal Gsα-adenylyl cyclase system that produces appropriate cAMP in response to PTH, but has a defect in the post-cAMP signaling pathway 3

Diagnostic Implications

  • Urinary cAMP excretion testing in response to PTH infusion is a sensitive and accurate diagnostic tool for differentiating between PHP1 and PHP2 2
  • In PHP1 patients, PTH infusion fails to increase urinary cAMP excretion despite elevated circulating PTH levels 2
  • In PHP2 patients, PTH infusion produces a normal increase in urinary cAMP excretion, but the phosphaturic response remains impaired 3
  • The basal excretion of cAMP is typically lower than normal in hypocalcemic disorders including both types of PHP 2

Genetic and Inheritance Patterns

  • PHP1 is associated with inherited mutations in the GNAS gene, with variable expression depending on parental origin of the affected allele 4, 5
  • Patients with PHP1 show partial deficiency of the receptor-cyclase coupling protein (N protein) in blood cells, often associated with Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy 5
  • Some family members of PHP1 patients may have deficient N protein activity but normal urinary cAMP responses to PTH, a condition sometimes called pseudo-pseudohypoparathyroidism 4, 5
  • PHP2 has less clearly defined genetic underpinnings but appears to involve defects downstream of cAMP production 3

Clinical Relevance

  • The distinction between PHP1 and PHP2 based on urinary cAMP response helps guide genetic testing and counseling for patients and families 1
  • PHP1 often presents with additional hormone resistance patterns beyond PTH, including TSH resistance, due to the broader role of Gsα in multiple hormone signaling pathways 5
  • PHP2 typically presents with isolated PTH resistance affecting phosphate excretion 3
  • Understanding the specific defect helps predict potential involvement of other hormone systems and guides monitoring for additional endocrine abnormalities 1

Treatment Considerations

  • In PHP2, calcium channel blockers may enhance the phosphaturic response to PTH, suggesting a role for intracellular calcium in the pathophysiology 3
  • Treatment with vitamin D analogs (e.g., 1α(OH)D3) can improve phosphaturic response in PHP2 patients 3
  • Management of both conditions focuses on normalizing calcium levels, but the underlying molecular differences may eventually lead to targeted therapeutic approaches 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.