How to prioritize treatment for 30 traumatized patients from a mass road traffic accident (RTA) in a hospital with limited 15 bed capacity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mass Casualty Incident Triage Management in a Limited-Capacity Hospital

In a mass casualty incident with 30 traumatized patients and only 15 hospital beds available, priority must be given to life-threatening traumas and states (option B) to maximize survival outcomes.

Understanding Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) Triage

Mass casualty incidents require a systematic approach to patient prioritization when resources are overwhelmed. The key principles include:

  • Triage decisions should be guided by the principle of seeking to help the greatest number of people survive the crisis 1
  • The standard of care may need to shift from conventional to contingency or crisis standards based on available resources 1
  • Field triage decision schemes provide a structured approach to identifying patients requiring immediate life-saving interventions 1

Implementing Effective Triage

Step 1: Initial Assessment and Categorization

  • Use a standardized triage system such as the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) method to quickly categorize patients 2
  • Assess vital signs and level of consciousness as primary triage indicators 1
  • Categorize patients into four priority levels:
    • Red (immediate): Life-threatening but salvageable injuries requiring immediate intervention
    • Yellow (delayed): Serious injuries requiring treatment but can wait
    • Green (minimal): Walking wounded with minor injuries
    • Black (expectant): Dead or injuries incompatible with survival 1

Step 2: Identify Patients Requiring Urgent Surgical Treatment

  • Prioritize patients with anatomical injuries that indicate severe trauma:

    • Penetrating injuries to head, neck, torso, and proximal extremities
    • Flail chest
    • Two or more proximal long-bone fractures
    • Crushed, degloved, or mangled extremities
    • Pelvic fractures 1
  • Create a separate patient flow for those requiring immediate surgical intervention, bypassing standard processing to improve evacuation and treatment times 3

Step 3: Resource Allocation

  • Allocate critical care resources based on:

    1. Interventions shown to improve survival without which death is likely
    2. Interventions not requiring extraordinarily expensive equipment
    3. Interventions implementable without consuming extensive staff or hospital resources 1
  • Focus on providing essential critical care interventions:

    • Basic mechanical ventilation
    • Hemodynamic support
    • IV fluid resuscitation and vasopressors
    • Antibiotic or other disease-specific countermeasure therapy 1

Step 4: Staff Deployment

  • Implement a two-tiered staffing model when critical care needs cannot be met by specialists alone:
    • Non-intensivists can manage approximately six critically ill patients each
    • Intensivists should coordinate the efforts of up to four non-intensivists
    • Non-critical care nurses can be assigned to no more than two critically ill patients 1

Optimizing Patient Distribution

  • Distribute patients among available hospitals when possible to prevent overwhelming a single facility 4
  • Consider transferring stabilized patients to other facilities to free up beds for more critical cases 1
  • Implement a phased evacuation approach:
    • First phase: Patients with evident trauma requiring immediate intervention
    • Second phase: Patients with less urgent conditions 4

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

  • Avoid treating all patients with equal priority (option A): This leads to inefficient resource utilization and potentially preventable deaths 1
  • Avoid prioritizing only your specialty cases (option C): This creates inequitable care and fails to address the overall goal of saving the most lives 1
  • Avoid undertriage: Missing severely injured patients who need higher-level care can result in preventable deaths 1
  • Beware of overtriage: Sending too many non-critical patients to critical care areas can overwhelm limited resources 1

Special Considerations

  • Reactive emergency mass critical care may be necessary as a temporizing strategy until additional resources become available 1
  • The hospital incident commander should have authority to initiate emergency protocols and should not have direct patient care responsibilities 1
  • Regularly reassess patients as their conditions may change, requiring adjustments to triage categories 2

By implementing a structured triage approach that prioritizes life-threatening injuries, you can maximize survival outcomes in this challenging scenario with limited resources.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.