Treatment for Pan-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection
For pan-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections, a combination therapy approach with ceftazidime/avibactam or meropenem/vaborbactam as the backbone, potentially combined with another active agent, represents the most effective treatment strategy based on current evidence. 1
First-Line Treatment Options
For KPC-producing Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
- Ceftazidime/avibactam or meropenem/vaborbactam should be used as first-line treatment options when available 1
- These novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to traditional antibiotic regimens 1
- Ceftazidime/avibactam has shown significantly higher clinical success rates and lower 28-day mortality (18.3% vs 40.8%) compared to other regimens in patients with KPC-producing K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections 1
Alternative Options
- Imipenem/relebactam and cefiderocol may be considered as alternatives when first-line agents are unavailable 1
- For infections susceptible to sulbactam, ampicillin-sulbactam can be considered, particularly for respiratory infections 1
Combination Therapy Approaches
For Severe Infections
- For severe infections caused by CRE susceptible only to polymyxins, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, or fosfomycin, treatment with more than one drug active in vitro is suggested 1
- High-dose tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, followed by 50 mg every 12 hours) combined with colistin has been successfully used to treat pan-resistant K. pneumoniae infections 2
- Double carbapenem therapy (e.g., meropenem plus ertapenem) combined with short-course colistin has shown synergistic and bactericidal effects against pandrug-resistant K. pneumoniae 3
Carbapenem-Based Combinations
- Carbapenem-based combination therapy should be avoided unless the meropenem MIC is ≤8 mg/L, where high-dose extended-infusion meropenem may be used as part of combination therapy 1
- For isolates with meropenem MIC ≤8 mg/L, high-dose extended-infusion carbapenem dosing as part of combination therapy is considered good clinical practice 1
Treatment Considerations for Non-Severe Infections
- For non-severe infections, monotherapy with an in vitro active agent may be considered on an individual basis according to the source of infection 1
- The choice should be guided by the least resistant antibiotic based on MICs relative to the breakpoints 1
Special Considerations
Source Control
- Optimal source control should always be a priority to improve outcomes and potentially shorten antibiotic treatment durations 1
- This is particularly important for pan-resistant infections where antimicrobial options are severely limited 1
Dosing Optimization
- Optimal antibiotic dosing schemes should be used, with attention to adverse effects 1
- Therapeutic drug monitoring should be utilized whenever available 1
- Extended infusions of β-lactams should be considered to optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters 1
Monitoring
- Follow-up cultures are recommended in case of treatment failure to detect resistance development 1
- This is especially important when using newer agents like ceftazidime/avibactam, as resistance can develop during treatment 4
Antibiotic Stewardship Considerations
- Extended use of cephalosporins should be discouraged in settings with high incidence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae 1
- Carbapenems should be preserved and used judiciously due to increasing carbapenem resistance among Enterobacteriaceae 1
- New agents like ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam should be used cautiously until their precise roles are further defined 1
Infection Control Measures
- All patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae should be managed using contact precautions 1
- Active surveillance cultures should be performed for patients with epidemiologic links to persons from whom CRE have been recovered 1
- In endemic areas, additional strategies to reduce CRE rates should be implemented 1