Comparative Efficacy of Adalimumab, Secukinumab, and Bimekizumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Adalimumab is currently the most well-established biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa, with the strongest evidence supporting its efficacy and safety profile, while Bimekizumab has shown promising results in recent trials with higher HiSCR50 response rates of 48-52% compared to adalimumab's 42-59%. 1, 2, 3
Efficacy Comparison
Adalimumab
- FDA-approved for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa with a well-established efficacy profile 3
- Demonstrated HiSCR response rates of 42% in PIONEER 1 and 59% in PIONEER 2 trials at week 12 (vs 26% and 28% for placebo) 3
- Weekly dosing (40mg) is significantly more effective than every-other-week dosing, with NNT of 5 for clinical response 4
- Has favorable benefit-risk ratio with NNT of 4 and NNH of 26 for serious adverse events 3
- Improves quality of life measures and pain scores in patients with moderate-to-severe disease 4
Bimekizumab
- Recently studied in BE HEARD I and II phase 3 trials with promising results 2
- Achieved HiSCR50 response rates of 48% in BE HEARD I and 52% in BE HEARD II at week 16 (vs 29% and 32% for placebo) 1, 2
- Both every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks dosing regimens showed efficacy, with responses maintained or increased through week 48 2
- Associated with improvement in patient-reported worst skin pain compared to placebo 1
- FDA approval status for hidradenitis suppurativa is recent (2024) 1
Secukinumab
- Limited data available in the provided evidence specifically for hidradenitis suppurativa 5
- Recently FDA-approved for hidradenitis suppurativa as mentioned in 2024 evidence 5
- In network meta-analysis, secukinumab 300mg every 2 weeks and every 4 weeks showed significant improvement in HiSCR50 compared to placebo 6
Safety Comparison
Adalimumab
- Well-established safety profile with extensive clinical experience 3
- Serious adverse event rates of 7.8% for weekly dosing vs 3.9% for placebo in clinical trials 7
- Long-term safety data available through multiple clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance 3
Bimekizumab
- Serious treatment-emergent adverse events reported in 5-8% of patients over 48 weeks 2
- Most common adverse events include hidradenitis exacerbation, oral candidiasis, headache, and diarrhea 1, 2
- No new safety signals identified in phase 3 trials 2
Secukinumab
- Limited specific safety data provided for hidradenitis suppurativa in the evidence 6, 5
- Network meta-analysis showed percentage of patients experiencing serious adverse events ranged from 0-6% in active treatment groups 6
Treatment Algorithm Based on Evidence
First-line biologic therapy: Adalimumab 160mg at week 0, 80mg at week 2, then 40mg weekly starting at week 4 for moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa unresponsive to antibiotics 3, 8
Alternative biologic options if inadequate response to adalimumab after 16 weeks:
Dosing considerations:
Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls
- Monitor treatment response using HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response), which measures reduction in inflammatory lesions 8, 9
- Assess quality of life improvement using DLQI and pain reduction using Visual Analog Scale 8, 10
- Be aware that non-responders at 12 weeks on adalimumab may still achieve response with continued treatment (40% of initial non-responders achieved response by week 36) 3
- Recognize that response may be lost over time - almost half of adalimumab responders at week 12 lost response by week 36 despite continued weekly dosing 3
- Consider patient comorbidities as HS is associated with obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, and metabolic syndrome 3
- Encourage weight loss and smoking cessation as adjunctive measures to improve treatment outcomes 8, 10
Special Populations
- Adalimumab is FDA-approved for children aged 12 years and older with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa 8, 10
- Limited data exists for biologics in pregnancy, breastfeeding, and elderly populations with hidradenitis suppurativa 3
- Treatment recommendations for children and adolescents are largely based on case reports and extrapolation from adult data 3