What is the efficacy of Taqman (Polymerase Chain Reaction) OpenArray based real-time PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) testing for diagnosing respiratory infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Efficacy of TaqMan OpenArray Based Real-Time PCR Testing for Respiratory Infections

TaqMan OpenArray based real-time PCR testing demonstrates high efficacy for diagnosing respiratory infections with sensitivity rates of 88-96% compared to other molecular methods, making it a reliable diagnostic tool for detecting respiratory pathogens. 1, 2

Diagnostic Performance of TaqMan Array Technology

  • Real-time PCR is considered the gold standard for diagnosing viral respiratory infections due to its high sensitivity and specificity compared to other testing methods 1
  • TaqMan array card (TAC) technology has demonstrated sensitivity of 92.9% in validation studies using spiked samples, showing high reliability for detecting clinically relevant concentrations of respiratory pathogens 2
  • Inter-assay agreement between TaqMan array technology and other multiplex PCR platforms is high (>95%) for most respiratory pathogen targets 2
  • When compared to other commercial assays like Fast-track Diagnostics, TaqMan array technology shows comparable performance with high accuracy for detecting common respiratory pathogens 2, 3

Clinical Applications and Benefits

  • Multiplex PCR panels like TaqMan OpenArray can detect multiple pathogens simultaneously when clinical presentation doesn't clearly indicate a specific pathogen 1
  • TaqMan array technology provides greater overall yield of pathogen detection and faster turnaround times compared to conventional methods, allowing for earlier discontinuation of unnecessary antimicrobials 4
  • In ICU settings, TaqMan array cards demonstrated 94% result agreement with conventional methods while detecting more pathogens overall 4
  • Median turnaround time for TaqMan array technology (1 day) is significantly shorter than bacterial/fungal culture (3 days), specialized PCR testing (3 days), and other conventional methods 4

Sample Collection Considerations

  • For optimal detection of respiratory pathogens, lower respiratory tract samples are preferred over upper respiratory tract (nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal) samples 1
  • High-quality sputum specimens yield significantly more pathogen detections compared to nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs when tested with TaqMan array technology 5
  • In a study of hospitalized pneumonia patients, both bacterial (361 versus 294) and viral detections (245 versus 140) were more common in sputum versus nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal specimens 5
  • Proper specimen collection technique significantly impacts test sensitivity - nasopharyngeal swabs should be collected using flocked, synthetic fiber mini-tip swabs with plastic or wire shafts 1

Clinical Impact and Implementation Considerations

  • Implementation of real-time PCR for respiratory infections significantly increases diagnostic yield (from 21% to 43% in one study) compared to conventional diagnostic tests 6
  • Syndromic diagnostic testing (multiplex PCR) should be performed using specimens taken from the endotracheal tube or bronchoalveolar lavage to avoid over-diagnosis of pulmonary infections 7
  • Syndromic diagnostic testing using specimens obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs is not recommended to guide antimicrobial treatment during the early phase of respiratory infections 7
  • TaqMan array technology can detect Streptococcus pneumoniae more readily than culture (7 vs 0 cases in one study), but may miss fungal pathogens like Aspergillus species 4

Limitations and Considerations

  • While real-time PCR increases diagnostic yield, it may not always reduce antibiotic use or costs without appropriate antimicrobial stewardship protocols in place 6
  • False-negative results may occur due to poor sample quality, collection timing relative to symptom onset, or low viral loads 1
  • Results with bacterial loads <10^5 copies/mL should be interpreted with caution, especially when commensal oral flora are detected 7
  • Some pathogens which play an important role in nosocomial infections may not be included in standard molecular panels 7

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.