What is a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN): Definition and Management

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a precursor lesion for pseudomyxoma peritonei that requires appropriate surgical management based on tumor characteristics to prevent peritoneal dissemination and recurrence. 1

Definition and Pathological Features

  • LAMN is characterized as a mass-forming pre-invasive neoplasm that grows within the appendix with mucinous epithelium showing low-grade dysplasia 2
  • These tumors display simple glandular architecture with elongated and crowded neoplastic cells that maintain polarity with respect to the basement membrane 2
  • LAMN is distinguished from high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms by the absence of pronounced nuclear atypia and loss of epithelial cell nuclear polarity 2
  • Two distinct subtypes have been identified: Type I (disease confined to the appendiceal lumen) and Type II (mucin and/or neoplastic epithelium in the appendiceal submucosa, wall, and/or periappendiceal tissue) 3

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

  • Most LAMNs are identified incidentally during appendectomy performed for suspected appendicitis or right iliac fossa pain 3, 4
  • The average age at presentation is approximately 60 years with no clear gender predilection 4
  • LAMNs can be asymptomatic but may rupture and seed mucin and neoplastic epithelium into the peritoneum, causing pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) 1
  • Microscopic examination may detect mucin and/or mucinous epithelium herniating into the appendiceal wall even without obvious perforation 4

Risk Factors for Progression

  • T stage, appendix perforation, presence of acellular mucin on the serosa, and surgical margins are risk factors for the development of pseudomyxoma peritonei 1
  • Type II lesions have pathological features that indicate increased risk for dissemination 3
  • Mucin, cells, or both outside the appendix are observed in approximately 58.5% of cases 5
  • Appendiceal rupture occurs in about 51.2% of cases and is a significant risk factor for peritoneal spread 5

Management Recommendations

  • For LAMN confined to the appendix (Type I):

    • Simple appendectomy is sufficient for well-differentiated tumors <1 cm with no adverse features 6
    • A watch-and-wait surveillance policy with serial measurement of tumor markers and CT imaging is appropriate 3
  • For LAMN with high-risk features (Type II):

    • Right hemicolectomy is indicated for tumors ≥2 cm, even without obvious malignant features 6
    • Further resection (right hemicolectomy) should be considered if the tumor breaches the serosal surface, invades the mesoappendix by more than 3 mm, or is located at the base of the appendix 6
    • When LAMN involves the appendiceal base, partial cecectomy is preferred by most specialists (67%) over right hemicolectomy (33%) 7
  • For LAMN with peritoneal spread:

    • Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is recommended for T4b disease or when mucinous implants contain tumor cells 1, 7
    • For limited peritoneal spread (confined to pelvis and right lower quadrant), macroscopically complete surgery followed by surveillance may be appropriate 5

Surveillance Recommendations

  • For patients with completely resected LAMN without high-risk features:

    • Follow-up examinations as clinically indicated, with some institutions suggesting examination at 1 year post-appendectomy and then with decreasing frequency 8
  • For larger tumors or those with adverse features:

    • Follow-up every 3-12 months for up to 10 years 6
    • Perform multiphasic CT or MRI (abdominal/pelvic) during follow-up 6
    • Consider chromogranin A as a tumor marker, particularly for neuroendocrine components 6, 8

Prognosis

  • When LAMN is treated surgically with resection of the primary site in early stage disease, there is an excellent prognosis 4
  • The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate is approximately 95.1% for radically resected LAMN, even with limited peritoneal spread 5
  • Recurrence typically occurs within 2 years of initial surgery in the small percentage of patients who experience disease progression 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Performing right hemicolectomy for all LAMNs is unnecessary and represents overtreatment for confined disease 7
  • Underestimating the risk of peritoneal spread in cases with high-risk features can lead to inadequate management 1
  • Failing to thoroughly examine the entire specimen for evidence of wall invasion or perforation may miss important prognostic information 4
  • Not considering the presence of acellular mucin on the serosa as a risk factor for recurrence 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Management and prognosis of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A clinicopathologic analysis of 50 cases.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2018

Guideline

Management of Low-Grade Appendiceal Neoplasm

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Tumor Markers for Appendiceal Cancers

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.