Management of Mammography Findings Based on BI-RADS Categories
The appropriate next steps for mammography findings depend directly on the BI-RADS category assigned, with specific management protocols for each category ranging from routine screening to immediate biopsy.
BI-RADS Categories and Definitions
- Category 0: Incomplete Assessment - Needs additional imaging evaluation and/or comparison with prior mammograms. Typically used in screening situations when additional views or ultrasound are needed 1
- Category 1: Negative - No abnormalities found, breasts are symmetric with no masses, architectural distortion, or suspicious calcifications 2, 1
- Category 2: Benign Findings - Negative mammogram with benign findings such as calcifying fibroadenomas, oil cysts, lipomas, intramammary lymph nodes, vascular calcifications, implants, or architectural distortion clearly related to prior surgery 2
- Category 3: Probably Benign - Findings have less than 2% likelihood of malignancy 2, 1
- Category 4: Suspicious Abnormality - Findings warrant biopsy consideration, risk of malignancy is variable but greater than category 3 and less than category 5 2
- Category 5: Highly Suggestive of Malignancy - Findings have a high probability (≥95%) of being cancer, examples include spiculated masses or malignant-appearing pleomorphic calcifications 2
- Category 6: Known Biopsy-Proven Malignancy - Lesions confirmed to be malignant through biopsy but before definitive therapies 2
Management Algorithm by BI-RADS Category
BI-RADS 0 (Incomplete Assessment)
- Proceed with additional imaging evaluation including comparison with prior films and/or diagnostic mammogram with or without ultrasound scan 2
- Complete the assessment to assign a definitive BI-RADS category 2
BI-RADS 1-2 (Negative or Benign)
BI-RADS 3 (Probably Benign)
- Perform short-interval follow-up with diagnostic mammograms at 6 months, then every 6-12 months for 1-2 years 2, 1
- At first 6-month follow-up, perform unilateral mammogram of the index breast 2
- At 12-month follow-up, perform bilateral mammography in women aged 40 years and older 2
- If the lesion remains stable or resolves, resume routine screening 2, 1
- If any interval mammogram shows increased size or changed characteristics, proceed to biopsy 2
- Consider initial biopsy instead of short-term follow-up if:
BI-RADS 4-5 (Suspicious or Highly Suggestive of Malignancy)
- Perform tissue diagnosis using core needle biopsy (preferred) or needle localization excisional biopsy with specimen radiograph 2, 1
- Ensure concordance between pathology report and imaging findings 2
- If pathology and imaging are discordant:
- For benign results with pathology/image concordance:
- Follow up with mammography every 6-12 months for 1-2 years before returning to routine screening 2
- For atypical hyperplasia, LCIS, or other potentially pathologic conditions:
BI-RADS 6 (Known Malignancy)
- Manage according to breast cancer treatment guidelines 2
Important Clinical Considerations
- The overall BI-RADS assessment is based on the most worrisome findings when multiple abnormalities are identified 2, 1
- When both mammography and ultrasound are performed, the BI-RADS categories represent the cumulative findings of both imaging modalities 2
- For women aged 30 years or older with a dominant breast mass, begin with bilateral diagnostic mammogram, not observation 2
- For solid lesions that are suspicious (BI-RADS 4-5) on ultrasound, tissue biopsy should be obtained using core needle biopsy (preferred) or surgical excision 2
- Recent research suggests that patients should undergo diagnostic biopsy instead of follow-up imaging if they are 50 years or older or exhibit calcification, nonparallel orientation of mass, non-circumscribed margin, or posterior shadowing 3
- Studies have shown that appropriate use of BI-RADS category 3 can save many patients from unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions without decreasing cancer detection rates 4, 5
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assign BI-RADS category 3 in a screening study without completing a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation 5
- Ensure proper use of BI-RADS descriptors to avoid inappropriate categorization 4
- Do not overrely on negative ultrasonographic findings when assigning BI-RADS categories 4
- Avoid discordance between pathology and imaging findings by ensuring thorough correlation 2
- Remember that the PPV of BI-RADS categories varies: category 3 has approximately 2% risk of malignancy, category 4 about 30%, and category 5 approximately 97% 6