Is the SelectMDx (Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Test) accurate in detecting prostate cancer and predicting the Gleason score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SelectMDx Test Accuracy for Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction

SelectMDx is a promising urinary biomarker test that shows comparable accuracy to multiparametric MRI in detecting prostate cancer and predicting Gleason score, but it is not currently included in major clinical guidelines as a recommended test for routine use in prostate cancer detection. 1, 2

Understanding SelectMDx

  • SelectMDx is a urine-based molecular test that measures mRNA expression of DLXI and HOXC6 genes to predict the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer 1, 2
  • It is designed to help identify patients at risk for high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7) before proceeding to invasive biopsy procedures 3
  • The test aims to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer 3

Accuracy of SelectMDx

For Prostate Cancer Detection:

  • SelectMDx demonstrates a pooled sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 69.8% for detecting prostate cancer 2
  • The negative predictive value (NPV) is approximately 85%, indicating good reliability in ruling out cancer 2
  • In comparison, multiparametric MRI shows similar sensitivity (80.8%) but slightly better specificity (73.4%) 2

For Gleason Score Prediction:

  • SelectMDx was specifically validated for detecting Gleason score ≥7 (ISUP Grade Group 2-5) prostate cancers 3
  • The test shows promising results in identifying patients with high-grade disease, with a sensitivity of 87.1% for clinically significant prostate cancer 4
  • When combined with clinical risk factors, SelectMDx can help stratify patients according to their risk of harboring aggressive disease 5

Comparison with Other Diagnostic Methods

  • SelectMDx outperforms PCA3 (another urinary biomarker) in predicting multiparametric MRI outcomes with an area-under-the-curve of 0.83 compared to 0.65 for PCA3 5
  • There is a positive association between SelectMDx score and PI-RADS grade, with statistically significant differences in SelectMDx scores between PI-RADS 3 and 4 (p<0.01) and between PI-RADS 4 and 5 (p<0.01) 5
  • When used in combination with mpMRI, SelectMDx can further refine patient selection for biopsy 6, 4

Clinical Impact and Utility

  • In real-world clinical practice, patients with positive SelectMDx results are five times more likely to undergo biopsy than those with negative results 3
  • Using both high-risk SelectMDx and PI-RADS scores of 4/5 as criteria for biopsy could potentially reduce unnecessary biopsies by 87%, while still detecting 64% of prostate cancers 6
  • In cases of PI-RADS 3 lesions with negative SelectMDx, unnecessary biopsies could be reduced by 42%, with only a 9% risk of missing high-grade prostate cancer 2

Current Guideline Recommendations

  • The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Early Detection do not specifically recommend SelectMDx as part of routine screening 1
  • Current guidelines recommend several biomarker tests for consideration before biopsy, including percent free PSA, 4Kscore, or Prostate Health Index (PHI) 1
  • For patients with prior negative biopsies, guidelines recommend consideration of percent free PSA, 4Kscore, PHI, PCA3, or ConfirmMDx 1

Limitations and Considerations

  • Most studies on SelectMDx have relatively small sample sizes and are from single institutions, which may limit generalizability 6
  • There is a risk of overfitting in some of the proposed predictive models 6
  • The Gleason scoring system itself has inherent limitations in predicting cancer aggressiveness, as it is based on subjective histopathological assessment 1, 7
  • SelectMDx is not FDA approved but is considered a laboratory-developed test, similar to some other prostate cancer biomarkers 1

Optimal Use Strategy

  • SelectMDx appears most valuable as part of a sequential testing approach, particularly after an initial negative mpMRI 4
  • A proposed algorithm would be to perform biopsy for all cases with PI-RADS 4-5 scores, and to consider SelectMDx testing for those with PI-RADS 1-3 scores to determine the need for biopsy 4
  • This approach could optimize the balance between detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and avoiding unnecessary biopsies 2, 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.