What is the recommended workup for a patient with suspected aortic stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Workup for Suspected Aortic Stenosis

The recommended workup for a patient with suspected aortic stenosis should begin with transthoracic echocardiography, which is the cornerstone diagnostic test for confirming the diagnosis and assessing severity. 1

Initial Evaluation

  • Physical examination findings that suggest aortic stenosis include a systolic ejection murmur, single or paradoxically split S2, and delayed/diminished carotid upstroke, though these may be less reliable in elderly patients 1
  • Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the primary diagnostic tool for confirming AS and should be performed when there is a systolic murmur grade 3/6 or greater, a single S2, or symptoms potentially attributable to AS 1

Echocardiographic Assessment

The three primary hemodynamic parameters to evaluate during echocardiography are:

  • AS peak jet velocity: A peak velocity ≥4 m/s is consistent with severe AS; should be obtained from multiple acoustic windows using a dedicated small dual-crystal CWD transducer 1
  • Mean transvalvular pressure gradient: A mean gradient ≥40 mmHg indicates severe AS 1
  • Aortic valve area (AVA) calculated by the continuity equation: An AVA <1.0 cm² indicates severe AS 1

Additional echocardiographic assessments should include:

  • Left ventricular wall thickness, size, and function 1
  • LVOT diameter measurement in parasternal long-axis view 1
  • Valve morphology and calcification 1
  • Assessment of other associated valvular disease 1

Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity

Parameter Mild Moderate Severe
Peak velocity (m/s) 2.6-2.9 3.0-4.0 ≥4.0
Mean gradient (mmHg) <20 20-40 ≥40
AVA (cm²) >1.5 1.0-1.5 <1.0
Indexed AVA (cm²/m²) >0.85 0.60-0.85 <0.6
Velocity ratio >0.50 0.25-0.50 <0.25

1

Special Considerations for Discordant Findings

When there is discrepancy between valve area and gradient measurements:

  • Low flow, low gradient AS with reduced ejection fraction (AVA <1.0 cm², mean gradient <40 mmHg, EF <50%, SVi <35 mL/m²):

    • Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is recommended to distinguish true severe AS from pseudosevere AS 1
    • Protocol starts at 2.5-5 μg/kg/min with incremental increases every 3-5 minutes to maximum 10-20 μg/kg/min 1
    • Severe AS is confirmed if velocity reaches ≥4 m/s or mean gradient ≥30-40 mmHg while AVA remains <1.0 cm² 1
  • Low flow, low gradient AS with preserved ejection fraction (AVA <1.0 cm², mean gradient <40 mmHg, EF ≥50%, SVi <35 mL/m²):

    • Confirm low flow with alternative techniques (3D TEE, MSCT, CMR) 1
    • Calcium score by MSCT can help confirm severity:
      • Severe AS likely: men ≥2000, women ≥1200 Agatston units
      • Severe AS very likely: men ≥3000, women ≥1600 Agatston units
      • Severe AS unlikely: men <1600, women <800 Agatston units 1

Additional Testing When Indicated

  • Exercise testing may be considered in asymptomatic patients to elicit exercise-induced symptoms and abnormal blood pressure responses (but should NOT be performed in symptomatic patients) 1
  • Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for valve calcification assessment when echocardiographic findings are discordant 1
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for flow assessment and LV function evaluation when echocardiographic images are suboptimal 1

Follow-up Recommendations

  • Asymptomatic severe AS: Echocardiography every year 1
  • Moderate AS: Echocardiography every 1-2 years 1
  • Mild AS: Echocardiography every 3-5 years 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Underestimation of jet velocity due to non-parallel intercept angle between ultrasound beam and high-velocity jet 1
  • Inaccurate LVOT diameter measurement leading to errors in AVA calculation; consider direct planimetry of LVOT by 3D TEE or MSCT 1
  • Failure to normalize blood pressure before assessment, as hypertension can alter velocity/gradient measurements 1
  • Overlooking concurrent conditions that may affect interpretation (e.g., mitral regurgitation, aortic regurgitation) 1
  • Misclassification of severity when there are discordant findings between AVA and gradient 1

Referral Recommendations

Cardiology referral is recommended for:

  • All patients with symptomatic moderate and severe AS
  • Patients with severe AS without apparent symptoms
  • Patients with AS and left ventricular systolic dysfunction 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Aortic Stenosis: Diagnosis and Treatment.

American family physician, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.