What does a Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) antibody result of 0.01 indicate?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

GAD65 Antibody Result of 0.01: Clinical Interpretation

A GAD65 antibody result of 0.01 is considered negative and indicates no evidence of autoimmune activity against glutamic acid decarboxylase. 1

Understanding GAD65 Antibodies

GAD65 (Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65) is an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an inhibitory neurotransmitter found in both neurons and pancreatic islet cells 2. Antibodies against GAD65 can be markers of several conditions:

  • Type 1 Diabetes: GAD65 antibodies are present in 70-80% of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients 1
  • Neurological disorders: Including stiff-person syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, limbic encephalitis, and certain forms of epilepsy 2
  • Other autoimmune conditions: Can be associated with autoimmune thyroid disease and pernicious anemia 2

Clinical Significance of the 0.01 Result

Negative Result Interpretation

  • The value of 0.01 falls well below the threshold for positivity (typically >0.02 or >2.0 depending on the assay units) 3, 4
  • This result effectively rules out GAD65 autoimmunity as a current concern 5

Diabetes Context

  • In type 1 diabetes, GAD65 antibodies are one of several autoimmune markers including islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies, and antibodies to tyrosine phosphatases IA-2 and IA-2β 1
  • The absence of GAD65 antibodies does not completely rule out type 1 diabetes, as approximately 10-15% of patients with type 1 diabetes may be negative for these antibodies 1

Neurological Context

  • For neurological disorders like stiff-person syndrome, GAD65 antibody levels are typically much higher (often >20 nmol/L) than those seen in diabetes 5
  • The negative result (0.01) effectively rules out GAD65-associated neurological autoimmunity 2

Clinical Applications

For Diabetes Assessment

  • A negative GAD65 antibody result suggests that if diabetes is present, it is less likely to be autoimmune type 1 diabetes 1
  • However, if clinical suspicion for type 1 diabetes remains high, testing for other autoantibodies (insulin autoantibodies, IA-2, ZnT8) may be warranted 1

For Neurological Assessment

  • The negative result essentially rules out GAD65-mediated autoimmune neurological conditions 2
  • If neurological symptoms are present, alternative diagnoses should be pursued 1

Laboratory Considerations

  • The sensitivity threshold for GAD65 antibody detection is approximately 2 ng/ml (31 fmol/ml) in most clinical assays 3
  • False negatives can occur early in disease development before antibody levels rise to detectable levels 1
  • Different assay methods (radioimmunoassay, ELISA) may have slightly different reference ranges and sensitivity 4

Follow-up Recommendations

  • If clinical suspicion for autoimmune disease remains despite negative GAD65 antibodies:
    • Consider testing for other diabetes-related autoantibodies if diabetes is suspected 1
    • Evaluate for other causes of neurological symptoms if present 1
    • Monitor for development of autoimmunity if family history or other risk factors exist 1

In summary, the GAD65 antibody result of 0.01 is negative and does not support a diagnosis of GAD65-mediated autoimmune disease, whether diabetes-related or neurological in nature 1, 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.