Follow-Up Approach for Patients with Initial BPH Diagnosis
Patients with an initial diagnosis of BPH should be evaluated by their providers 4-12 weeks after starting treatment to assess response to therapy, with follow-up evaluation including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). 1
Initial Evaluation Components
- The AUA Symptom Index (identical to the IPSS) should be used as the primary symptom-scoring instrument in the initial assessment and subsequent follow-up visits 1
- Medical history, physical examination (including digital rectal examination), and urinalysis are mandatory components of the initial evaluation 1
- Serum PSA testing is recommended for patients with a life expectancy >10 years and when knowledge of prostate cancer would change management 1
Follow-Up Timeline and Assessment
For Medication-Based Treatment
First follow-up visit timing:
Assessment at follow-up visits should include:
For Watchful Waiting Approach
- Annual follow-up is recommended for patients with mild symptoms (IPSS <8) 2
- More frequent follow-up may be warranted if symptoms worsen 1
Treatment Adjustment Algorithm
If symptoms improve and side effects are tolerable: Continue current therapy with annual follow-up 1
If symptoms do not improve or side effects are intolerable:
Indications for urological referral:
Special Considerations
- Symptom score changes and the degree of bother should be the primary determinants of treatment response or disease progression 1
- BPH can be progressive, with prevalence of moderate-to-severe LUTS rising to nearly 50% by age 80 1, 4
- The risk of acute urinary retention increases with age, from 6.8 episodes per 1,000 patient years overall to 34.7 episodes in men aged 70 and older 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to reassess symptoms with a validated tool like IPSS at follow-up visits 1
- Not considering prostate size when evaluating treatment response (prostate >30cc may benefit from addition of 5ARI) 1
- Overlooking the need for longer follow-up periods (3-6 months) when evaluating 5ARI efficacy 1
- Neglecting to assess for complications of BPH that may require more urgent intervention 1, 3