Effectiveness of Phosphatidylcholine and Deoxycholate for Mesolipo Therapy on Abdomen
Both phosphatidylcholine (PC) and sodium deoxycholate (DC) are effective for reducing localized abdominal fat through mesolipo therapy, with evidence suggesting that deoxycholate alone may be the primary active ingredient causing adipocyte destruction. 1
Mechanism of Action and Effectiveness
- PC-DC injections reduce subcutaneous fat by inducing adipocyte necrosis, leading to significant reductions in abdominal fat volume and thickness 2
- Histological examination of post-injection tissue shows marked changes including substitution of fat by fibrosis, inflammatory infiltration, and fat necrosis with microcalcification and cyst formation 3
- Controlled studies demonstrate that both PC-DC combinations and DC alone produce similar reductions in fat deposits, with metric reductions of approximately 6.5% and ultrasonographic reductions of approximately 36% 1
Comparative Efficacy
- Randomized controlled trials comparing PC-DC combination versus DC alone found no statistically significant differences in fat reduction effectiveness between the two treatments 1
- Research suggests that sodium deoxycholate may be the primary active component responsible for adipocyte lysis, while phosphatidylcholine may help with later emulsification of the fat 4, 1
- Studies examining lipoma treatment with DC alone (at concentrations of 1.0%, 2.5%, and 5.0%) showed mean area reductions of 75% (range 37-100%) after an average of 2.2 treatments 4
Treatment Protocol
- Multiple treatment sessions are typically required, with optimal results often seen after three sessions 5
- Treatment intervals of 2-8 weeks between sessions are commonly used in clinical studies 5, 1
- The presence of phospholipids (such as lecithin in PC) may provide a protective effect against the cytotoxicity of deoxycholate when used in combination 6
Safety Considerations and Side Effects
- Common side effects include transient burning, erythema, local swelling, heavy sensation, localized heat, nodulations, and slight bruising that typically resolve within 3-5 days after treatment 5, 4
- Side effects are generally more pronounced with DC alone compared to PC-DC combinations 1
- Higher concentrations of deoxycholate are associated with increased adverse effects, though these typically resolve without intervention 4
- PC-DC treatments do not appear to increase circulating markers of inflammation or affect glucose and lipid metabolism 2
Cautions
- Histological examination shows significant inflammatory changes and tissue remodeling, indicating that careful patient selection is important 3
- The treatment should be considered as an alternative to invasive procedures for patients with localized fat deposits who are not candidates for or prefer to avoid surgical interventions 5
- There is limited long-term safety data available, as most studies focus on short-term outcomes 2, 1
Optimal Candidates
- Patients with BMI ≤30 kg/m² with localized subcutaneous fat deposits are ideal candidates 2
- The treatment is most effective for small to moderate collections of fat rather than for significant obesity 4
- Patients should have realistic expectations regarding the degree of fat reduction achievable with this non-surgical approach 5, 1