What is the percentage of Enterococcus faecalis resistant to linezolid?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Linezolid Resistance in Enterococcus Faecalis

Linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecalis remains rare, with sustained susceptibility rates of approximately 99.8% according to surveillance programs. 1

Prevalence and Epidemiology

  • The prevalence of linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecalis is significantly lower than in other enterococcal species, with most surveillance programs reporting resistance rates below 1% 1
  • In contrast to vancomycin resistance, which can be as high as 82.1% for E. faecalis according to the U.S. CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network, linezolid resistance remains uncommon 2
  • Linezolid resistance is more frequently observed in healthcare-associated settings, particularly in patients with prolonged exposure to the antibiotic 3
  • Some regional variations exist, with one study from a tertiary hospital in China reporting linezolid resistance/intermediate rates as high as 22.61% among E. faecalis isolates from urinary tract infections 4

Mechanisms of Resistance

  • The primary mechanism of linezolid resistance in E. faecalis is the G2576T (also noted as G2576U) mutation in the 23S rRNA, which accounts for approximately 51.2% of resistant isolates 1, 5
  • Additional resistance mechanisms include:
    • The cfr gene (present in approximately 4.7% of linezolid-resistant E. faecalis), which can transfer horizontally between strains 1
    • The optrA gene, which has been increasingly identified in resistant isolates, particularly in China 4, 6
    • The poxtA gene, often found alongside optrA and cfr-like variants in multi-resistant strains 6
  • A gene dosage effect has been observed, where the number of mutated copies of 23S rRNA correlates with the level of resistance 5

Risk Factors for Developing Resistance

  • Prior exposure to linezolid is the most significant risk factor, with a mean treatment duration of 29.8±48.8 days associated with the development of resistance in E. faecalis 1, 3
  • Extended courses of linezolid therapy (>30 days) significantly increase the risk of resistance development 3
  • Additional risk factors identified in clinical studies include:
    • Indwelling catheters 4
    • Tracheal cannulation 4
    • Prolonged hospitalization, particularly in intensive care settings 1

Clinical Implications

  • For vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis infections, linezolid remains an important therapeutic option despite isolated cases of resistance 2, 7
  • In patients who have recently received extended linezolid therapy and develop a new enterococcal infection, susceptibility testing should be performed promptly to guide therapy 3
  • For patients with linezolid-resistant E. faecalis, alternative agents such as daptomycin (8-12 mg/kg/day) may be considered, particularly for bloodstream infections 2, 7
  • For intra-abdominal infections with vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis that are also linezolid-resistant, tigecycline may be an appropriate alternative 2

Prevention Strategies

  • Judicious use of linezolid, particularly avoiding prolonged courses when alternatives are available 3
  • Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs to monitor linezolid use in healthcare settings 1
  • Prompt identification and isolation of patients with linezolid-resistant enterococci to prevent horizontal transmission 6
  • Regular surveillance of linezolid susceptibility patterns in clinical isolates, especially in high-risk settings 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.