How do you interpret a difference in bicarbonate (HCO3) levels between arterial blood gas (ABG) and serum electrolyte panel results?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Interpreting Differences Between Bicarbonate Levels in ABG and Serum

When there is a difference between bicarbonate levels measured in arterial blood gas (ABG) and serum electrolyte panels, the serum bicarbonate value should be considered more reliable for screening purposes, with a threshold of >27 mmol/L indicating the need for ABG confirmation of hypercapnia. 1

Understanding the Measurement Differences

  • Serum bicarbonate on a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) is actually measured as total CO2 content, which includes bicarbonate (HCO3-), dissolved CO2, and other minor carbon dioxide components, with bicarbonate representing approximately 96% of the total 2

  • ABG bicarbonate values are typically calculated rather than directly measured, using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation based on pH and PCO2 measurements, which can introduce calculation errors 3

  • Significant differences between serum total CO2 and calculated ABG bicarbonate have been documented, with human calculation error identified as a potential source of these discrepancies 3

Clinical Implications and Recommendations

When to Trust Serum Bicarbonate vs. ABG Values

  • For screening purposes (such as for Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome), serum bicarbonate levels are more reliable, with a threshold of >27 mmol/L indicating the need for ABG confirmation 1

  • A serum bicarbonate <27 mmol/L has a very high negative predictive value (99.0%; 95% CI, 97.9–99.6%) for ruling out conditions like OHS, potentially eliminating the need for arterial blood sampling 1

  • When critical decisions need to be made about acid-base status, ABG values should be used as they provide direct measurement of pH and PCO2, allowing for more accurate assessment of the primary disorder and compensation 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on ABG sodium values for clinical decision-making, as significant differences have been documented between ABG and auto-analyzer sodium measurements 5, 6

  • Potassium values from ABG and auto-analyzer measurements show better correlation and can be more reliably used for clinical decisions 6

  • Time delays in processing samples can significantly affect measurements - blood samples should be analyzed within 15 minutes of collection to minimize pre-analytical errors 7

  • Temperature affects sample stability - samples stored at room temperature show faster and greater changes in pH, PaO2, PaCO2, and electrolytes compared to samples stored on ice 7

Algorithm for Interpreting Bicarbonate Discrepancies

  1. If screening for conditions like OHS:

    • Use serum bicarbonate with a threshold of 27 mmol/L 1
    • If serum bicarbonate <27 mmol/L, OHS is highly unlikely 1
    • If serum bicarbonate >27 mmol/L, proceed with ABG to confirm hypercapnia 1
  2. If assessing acute acid-base disorders:

    • Rely primarily on ABG values for pH, PCO2, and calculated HCO3- 4
    • If large discrepancies exist between serum and ABG bicarbonate:
      • Consider recalculating the ABG bicarbonate using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation 3
      • Check sample collection timing and storage conditions 7
      • Consider the possibility of laboratory error 3
  3. For electrolyte management:

    • Trust potassium values from either ABG or serum measurements 6
    • Rely on serum sodium rather than ABG sodium measurements 5, 6

By following this approach, clinicians can appropriately interpret differences between bicarbonate measurements and make sound clinical decisions based on the most reliable values for the specific clinical context.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Bicarbonate Measurement and Interpretation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Analysing arterial blood gas results using the RoMe technique.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 2024

Research

Effects of temperature and time delay on arterial blood gas and electrolyte measurements.

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand =, Chotmaihet thangphaet.., 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.