Management of Thyroid Nodules with NRAS Q61K Mutation
Surgery is recommended for this patient with a 3.07 cm TR4 thyroid nodule with atypia of undetermined significance, Hurthle cells, and NRAS p.Q61K mutation, rather than a wait-and-see approach, due to the intermediate-to-high probability of cancer.
Evaluation of the Current Case
- The patient has a 3.07 cm right thyroid nodule classified as TR4 (intermediate suspicion) with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) on cytology and NRAS p.Q61K mutation at 13% allele frequency 1
- The molecular testing indicates an intermediate-to-high probability of cancer or NIFTP (non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features) 1
- The left thyroid nodule is smaller (1.0-1.2 cm), also TR4, but with benign cytology (Bethesda II) 1
- Thyroid function tests are normal, and autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto's) is present 1
Significance of NRAS Mutation
- NRAS mutations, particularly at codon 61 (including Q61K), are associated with follicular-patterned thyroid neoplasms 2
- The presence of an NRAS mutation in a follicular neoplasm increases the risk of malignancy, with studies showing a positive predictive value of 67% for cancer 3
- While NRAS Q61K mutations are less common than NRAS Q61R (15% vs. 44% of RAS mutations), they still indicate increased risk of neoplasia 2
- NRAS-mutated nodules are associated with a higher overall malignancy rate (79% versus 52% in NRAS-negative nodules) 3
Risk Assessment and Management Options
- The 3.07 cm size of the nodule exceeds the threshold for observation, as most guidelines do not recommend observation for nodules >1 cm with suspicious features 1
- The combination of NRAS mutation, follicular/Hurthle-cell cytology, and nodule size indicates a significant risk of follicular carcinoma, Hurthle cell carcinoma, or NIFTP 1
- While NIFTP is considered a low-risk lesion with excellent prognosis (<1% risk of recurrence), it requires complete histopathological examination to confirm the diagnosis, which necessitates surgical excision 1
- The patient also has Hashimoto's thyroiditis, which contributes to the Hurthle cell changes but does not negate the risk associated with the NRAS mutation 4
Recommendations Based on Current Guidelines
- For nodules with indeterminate cytology (AUS) and molecular testing suggesting increased cancer risk, surgical management is recommended rather than observation 1
- The size of the nodule (3.07 cm) exceeds the threshold where active surveillance would typically be considered, even for low-risk lesions 1
- While thermal ablation may be considered for some thyroid nodules, it is primarily recommended for smaller, well-characterized lesions or when surgery is contraindicated 1
- Regular follow-up is essential regardless of the treatment approach, including assessment of nodule volume, clinical symptoms, and thyroid function 1
Why Surgery is Preferred Over Observation
- The nodule's size (3.07 cm) is significant and exceeds thresholds for observation in most guidelines 1
- The presence of an NRAS mutation increases the likelihood of malignancy, particularly follicular-patterned carcinomas 3, 4
- Complete histopathological examination is necessary to determine if the lesion is NIFTP, minimally invasive follicular carcinoma, or another entity 1
- Surgical management allows for definitive diagnosis and appropriate risk stratification for any potential malignancy 1
- Even if the final diagnosis is NIFTP, surgical excision is necessary to confirm this diagnosis through thorough examination of the capsule 1
Post-Management Follow-up
- If surgery is performed, follow-up should include thyroid function testing and monitoring for recurrence based on the final pathology 1
- If the lesion proves to be malignant, TSH suppression therapy may be indicated depending on risk stratification 1
- Regular ultrasound surveillance of the remaining thyroid tissue and cervical lymph nodes should be performed at appropriate intervals 1
Conclusion
Based on the nodule's size, cytology findings, and NRAS mutation status, a wait-and-see approach is not recommended for this patient. Surgical management (at minimum a lobectomy) would provide definitive diagnosis and appropriate treatment for what is likely a neoplastic process with intermediate-to-high risk of malignancy.