What is the management of choledocholithiasis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Choledocholithiasis

The mainstay of therapy for choledocholithiasis is endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy and stone extraction during ERCP, with a reported success rate of 90%. 1

Initial Assessment and Management

  • Choledocholithiasis affects approximately 10% of patients with gallstone disease and requires intervention even when asymptomatic due to risks of obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, acute pancreatitis, and potentially secondary biliary cirrhosis 1
  • Initial medical management is indicated to stabilize hemodynamic status and treat local and systemic infections in cases of acute biliary obstruction 1
  • In acute cholangitis, biliary decompression is lifesaving and should be performed promptly 1

Diagnostic Approach

  • For suspected choledocholithiasis, risk stratification should guide the diagnostic approach 1
  • For moderate risk patients, preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) should be performed with sensitivities of 93% and 95% respectively 1
  • Intraoperative cholangiography or laparoscopic ultrasound can also be used to evaluate moderate risk patients with similar diagnostic accuracy 1
  • High-risk patients should undergo preoperative ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, or laparoscopic ultrasound depending on local expertise 1

Therapeutic Options

Endoscopic Management (First-line)

  • ERCP with sphincterotomy and stone extraction is the mainstay of therapy with 90% success rate 1
  • For large stones (>10-15 mm), lithotripsy or stone fragmentation may be required, with lithotripsy having a 79% success rate 1
  • In cases of incomplete stone extraction or severe acute cholangitis, placement of an internal plastic stent ensures adequate biliary drainage 1
  • Endoscopic sphincterotomy carries a 6-10% major complication rate, increasing to 19% in elderly patients with a mortality rate of 7.9% 1
  • Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) may offer prolonged patency compared to plastic stents, but data are limited 1

Percutaneous Approaches

  • Percutaneous transhepatic balloon dilation of the papilla with stone extraction is an alternative with success rates of 95-100% in experienced hands 1
  • For difficult cases, a rendezvous technique combining percutaneous and endoscopic approaches can be used 1
  • In biliary sepsis where stones cannot be primarily crossed, placement of internal/external or external biliary catheters can be lifesaving 1

Surgical Management

  • Surgical common bile duct exploration was historically the procedure of choice but is now generally reserved for when stones cannot be managed non-surgically 1
  • Open CBD exploration carries 20-40% morbidity and 1.3-4% mortality 1
  • Laparoscopic CBD exploration has grown in popularity with success rates up to 95% and complication rates of 5-18% 1
  • For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration may be preferable to endoscopic duct clearance 1
  • After repeated failed ERCP attempts, surgical management with choledochotomy and bilioenteric anastomosis provides an effective long-term solution 2

Special Considerations

Pregnancy

  • ERCP can be performed during pregnancy for urgent indications such as choledocholithiasis and cholangitis 1
  • Ideally, ERCP should be performed during the second trimester as first trimester procedures are associated with poorer fetal outcomes 1
  • Pregnancy is an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (12% vs 5% in non-pregnant women) 1
  • A multidisciplinary approach involving an advanced endoscopist, maternal-fetal medicine physician, neonatologist, obstetrician, and anesthesiologist is recommended 1

Treatment Algorithm

  1. Initial assessment: Evaluate severity, presence of cholangitis, and risk stratification for choledocholithiasis
  2. For moderate risk: Perform MRCP or EUS to confirm diagnosis
  3. For high risk or confirmed stones: Proceed with ERCP as first-line therapy
  4. If ERCP successful: Complete stone clearance with sphincterotomy and extraction
  5. If large stones present: Add lithotripsy or fragmentation techniques
  6. If incomplete extraction: Place temporary biliary stent
  7. If ERCP fails: Consider percutaneous approach or surgical management
  8. For patients with cholecystitis: Schedule cholecystectomy after bile duct clearance

Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Multiple ERCP attempts before declaring failure may lead to procedure-related complications in up to 23.5% of patients 2
  • Recent data suggests that a significant proportion of patients (74.3%) have findings (sludge, small stones <7mm, or negative ERCP) that could potentially be managed with simpler intraoperative interventions 3
  • A "surgery-first" approach with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, cholangiogram, and common bile duct exploration may be appropriate for selected patients, offering reduced hospital stays with equivalent morbidity 3
  • Endoscopic sphincterotomy carries significantly higher complication rates in elderly patients and should be performed with caution in this population 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Surgical Treatment for Choledocholithiasis Following Repeated Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.