Is S1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) medicine for 6 months a reasonable approach for adjuvant chemotherapy after radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer with positive lymph nodes and negative liver and cystic duct margins?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy with S1 After Radical Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Cancer

S1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) for 6 months is an appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy approach for gallbladder cancer with positive lymph nodes after radical cholecystectomy with negative margins. This recommendation is supported by clinical guidelines and evidence showing survival benefit in patients with high-risk features such as lymph node positivity.

Evidence Supporting S1 Adjuvant Therapy

  • A 6-month course of oral fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine or S1) is strongly recommended following potentially curative resection of biliary tract cancers according to recent guidelines 1
  • The ASCOT trial in Japan demonstrated that adjuvant therapy with four 6-weekly cycles of S1 (tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil) led to significantly longer survival than surgery alone (HR 0.694, P = 0.008) 1
  • For patients with high-risk features such as node-positive disease, adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy is recommended to reduce recurrence risk 2

Risk Stratification and Treatment Rationale

  • Patients with positive lymph nodes (as in your case) are at high risk for recurrence and show particularly pronounced benefit from adjuvant therapy 2
  • The presence of 4 positive lymph nodes represents a significant risk factor for recurrence, making adjuvant therapy strongly indicated 2
  • Negative liver and cystic duct margins (R0 resection) are favorable prognostic factors, but lymph node positivity still warrants adjuvant treatment 1

Treatment Options and Rationale for S1

  • S1 has been shown to be effective in biliary tract cancers and has demonstrated feasibility as adjuvant therapy with a high completion rate of 81.8% in clinical studies 3
  • Fluoropyrimidine-based regimens (including S1) are the standard of care for adjuvant therapy in biliary tract cancers based on positive clinical trials 1
  • The 6-month duration aligns with established protocols from major clinical trials and guidelines 1

Expected Outcomes

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves survival in node-positive gallbladder cancer patients 4
  • In patients with resected biliary tract cancer receiving S1 adjuvant therapy, 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 39.4% and 3-year overall survival rate was 54.5% 3
  • Without adjuvant therapy, patients with node-positive disease have significantly worse outcomes (median survival of 5 months vs 16 months with treatment) 2

Potential Side Effects and Management

  • The most common grade 3/4 adverse event with S1 is neutropenia (18%) 3
  • Grade 2 nausea or diarrhea may occur in approximately 12% of patients 3
  • S1 has shown favorable tolerability compared to other regimens, with many patients able to complete the full course of therapy 3

Conclusion

The recommendation of S1 for 6 months as adjuvant chemotherapy is appropriate for this patient with gallbladder cancer who has undergone radical cholecystectomy with negative margins but positive lymph nodes. This approach is supported by clinical guidelines and evidence showing survival benefit in high-risk patients, particularly those with lymph node involvement.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gallbladder Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.