What is the recommended staging system for Wilms tumor?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Staging System for Wilms Tumor

The recommended staging system for Wilms tumor is the National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTSG) staging system, which classifies tumors into stages I through V based on surgical findings and tumor extent. 1

NWTSG Staging System Overview

  • Stage I: Tumor limited to kidney and completely excised; renal capsule intact; no tumor rupture or biopsy prior to removal; no residual tumor apparent beyond margins of resection 2

  • Stage II: Tumor extends beyond kidney but is completely removed; regional extension of tumor (penetration of renal capsule or extensive invasion of renal sinus); vessels outside kidney contain tumor thrombus; biopsy or local spillage confined to flank 3

  • Stage III: Residual non-hematogenous tumor confined to abdomen; any of the following: lymph node involvement; diffuse peritoneal contamination by tumor spillage; peritoneal implants; tumor beyond surgical margins either microscopically or grossly; tumor not completely removed 3, 4

  • Stage IV: Hematogenous metastases or lymph node metastases outside the abdomen (lung, liver, bone, brain) 4

  • Stage V: Bilateral renal involvement at diagnosis (each side should be staged separately) 2, 5

Clinical Significance of Staging

  • Accurate staging is critical as it directly impacts treatment decisions and survival outcomes 5

  • Stage I-II favorable histology tumors have excellent outcomes with 4-year overall survival of 98.3% and 92% respectively 2, 3

  • Stage III favorable histology has 4-year event-free survival of 88% and overall survival of 97% with appropriate therapy 3

  • Stage IV disease has significantly lower survival rates, with 4-year event-free survival around 33.3% for anaplastic histology 2

  • Bilateral disease (Stage V) has 4-year event-free survival of approximately 43.8% and overall survival of 55.2% 2

Prognostic Factors Beyond Staging

  • Histology: Favorable histology vs. anaplastic histology (diffuse or focal) is a critical determinant of prognosis 2

  • Genetic markers: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosomes 1p and 16q is associated with poorer outcomes in all stages 3

  • Lymph node status: Negative lymph node status is associated with better event-free survival 3

  • Age at diagnosis: Adults with Wilms tumor have different outcomes compared to children, with 5-year disease-specific survival of 95.7% 4

Special Considerations in Staging

  • Genetic testing for predisposition syndromes (TRIM28, REST, CTR9, DIS3L2) should be considered as part of comprehensive evaluation 6

  • Patients with epithelial-predominant histology should be tested for TRIM28 pathogenic variants, as 86% of these tumors harbor TRIM28 variants 6

  • Bilateral tumors require careful consideration, as they often represent genetic predisposition syndromes requiring surveillance of family members 6

  • For patients with delayed nephrectomy after preoperative chemotherapy, histologic response in the nephrectomy specimen provides additional prognostic information 3

Surveillance Recommendations Based on Staging

  • For patients with identified genetic predisposition syndromes, renal ultrasound surveillance every 3 months until 8 years of age is recommended 6

  • For patients with stage I-IV disease who have completed therapy, continued surveillance is recommended, especially for those with genetic predisposition syndromes 6

  • The risk of second tumors after completion of therapy may be higher in patients with genetic predisposition syndromes compared to the general population 6

  • Surveillance should be tailored based on specific genetic findings, with special attention to those with REST, CTR9, and TRIM28 pathogenic variants 6

References

Research

Wilms' tumor. Overview of National Wilms' Tumor Study Group results.

The Urologic clinics of North America, 2000

Research

Treatment of anaplastic histology Wilms' tumor: results from the fifth National Wilms' Tumor Study.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006

Research

Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Stage III Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study AREN0532.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018

Research

Wilms' tumor: past, present and (possibly) future.

Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2006

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.