Which specialist performs fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of an inguinal lymph node?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Specialist Who Performs Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Inguinal Lymph Nodes

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of inguinal lymph nodes is typically performed by interventional radiologists, particularly those with ultrasound expertise, as ultrasound guidance is the preferred method for this procedure. 1

Procedure Details and Specialists

  • Ultrasound-guided FNAC is the recommended approach for sampling inguinal lymph nodes, especially in cases where dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) is not available 1
  • The procedure is commonly performed by:
    • Interventional radiologists with ultrasound expertise 1
    • Cytopathologists trained in aspiration techniques 2
    • Surgeons with specific training in FNAC techniques 1

Clinical Indications

  • FNAC is indicated for:
    • Palpable inguinal lymph nodes to diagnose potential metastases 1
    • Non-palpable but suspicious nodes visualized on imaging 1
    • Follow-up of patients with known malignancies that may metastasize to inguinal nodes 3, 4

Diagnostic Value

  • FNAC has high diagnostic accuracy when performed properly:
    • Sensitivity of 76.9-91.7% 2, 4
    • Specificity of 98.2-100% 2, 4
    • Positive predictive value of 97.7% 2
    • Negative predictive value of 95.45% 2

Procedural Considerations

  • The conventional aspiration method is used with on-site cytologic examination 2
  • Multiple preparation methods enhance diagnostic accuracy:
    • Papanicolaou-stained fixed smears
    • Diff-Quik-stained air-dried smears
    • Cell block preparation for histologic architecture assessment 2, 5
  • In cases of negative FNAC but clinically suspicious nodes, repeat biopsy or node excision is advised 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • False-negative results may occur due to:
    • Sampling error (inadequate material) 5
    • Small metastatic deposits (<1 cm) 4, 5
    • Low-grade malignancies mimicking reactive lymphoid tissue 5
  • False-positive results are rare but may occur with:
    • Viral-associated lymphadenopathy 5
    • Inflammatory conditions mimicking malignancy 5
  • Up to 50% of palpable inguinal nodes at initial diagnosis may be enlarged due to inflammatory changes rather than metastatic disease 1

Clinical Pathway

  • For non-palpable nodes in high-risk patients: ultrasound-guided FNAC is recommended when DSNB is not available 1
  • For palpable nodes: direct FNAC is the preferred first-line diagnostic approach 1
  • If FNAC is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, excisional biopsy should be considered 1
  • Positive FNAC results can guide immediate management decisions, including the extent of surgical intervention 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.