What type of thyroplasty prosthesis is considered bad: Autologous, Silastic (silicone), Ceramic, or Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The worst prosthesis for thyroplasty is Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) due to its association with foreign body granulomas that can result in voice deterioration and airway compromise, as reported in the most recent clinical practice guideline update 1.

Thyroplasty Prosthesis Options

The options for thyroplasty prostheses include:

  • Autologous materials, such as cartilage, which offer excellent biocompatibility with minimal rejection risk
  • Silastic (medical-grade silicone), which is considered the gold standard material for thyroplasty due to its appropriate stiffness, flexibility, and biocompatibility
  • Ceramic materials, which are generally not suitable for thyroplasty procedures due to their rigidity and poor biocompatibility with vocal fold tissues
  • Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), which is not recommended due to its association with foreign body granulomas

Rationale for Recommendation

The use of Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) as a permanent injectable implant is not recommended due to its potential to cause foreign body granulomas, leading to voice deterioration and airway compromise, as stated in the clinical practice guideline update 1 and also mentioned in an earlier study 1. In contrast, Silastic (medical-grade silicone) and autologous materials have been shown to provide good outcomes in thyroplasty procedures, with minimal complications. Ceramic materials are not commonly used in thyroplasty due to their rigidity and poor biocompatibility.

Key Considerations

When selecting a thyroplasty prosthesis, it is essential to consider the material's biocompatibility, flexibility, and potential for complications. The ideal thyroplasty implant should balance appropriate stiffness with flexibility to allow natural vocal fold vibration while providing the necessary medialization of the vocal fold for proper phonation. According to the most recent clinical practice guideline update 1, the use of Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) is not recommended, making it the worst prosthesis option for thyroplasty.

From the Research

Types of Thyroplasty Prostheses

  • Autologous: considered a viable option for thyroplasty, particularly in complex or revision procedures 2
  • Silastic (silicone): commonly used, but may be accompanied by risks of carcinogenicity, foreign body reaction, and induction of collagen disease 3, 4, 5, 6
  • Ceramic: proposed as a safe substitute for silicone, with satisfactory results in a limited number of cases 3
  • Gore-Tex (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene): provides comparable results to Silastic, but with limited data availability and publication bias 5

Comparison of Outcomes

  • Silastic and Gore-Tex implants have been compared in a systematic review and meta-analysis, showing comparable results in terms of maximum phonation time and voice handicap index scores 5
  • Bilateral medialization thyroplasty using silastic or hydroxyapatite implants has been shown to improve vocal quality in patients with presbylaryngis 6

Potential Risks and Complications

  • Silastic implants may be associated with risks of carcinogenicity, foreign body reaction, and induction of collagen disease 3
  • Intraoperative challenges, such as mucosal violation, hemorrhage, and infection, can be managed using autologous strap muscle rotation flaps 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The Utility of Strap Muscle in Complex Type I Thyroplasties.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2021

Research

Thyroplasty type I with ceramic shim.

Auris, nasus, larynx, 1993

Research

Treatment Outcomes of Bilateral Medialization Thyroplasty for Presbylaryngis.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.