What is the best choice between Vedolizumab (Intyvio) and IL-23 inhibitors for treating moderate to severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vedolizumab vs IL-23 Inhibitors for IBD: Comparative Efficacy and Safety

For moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), vedolizumab (Entyvio) is recommended as the preferred first-line biologic therapy over IL-23 inhibitors due to its established long-term safety profile, gut-selective mechanism of action, and strong evidence supporting its efficacy in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Efficacy Comparison

Vedolizumab (Entyvio)

  • Strong recommendation for both induction and maintenance therapy in moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease with moderate-quality evidence 1
  • Recommended for induction and maintenance of remission in UC with strong evidence 1
  • Long-term data shows impressive remission rates: 83% of responders remained in remission after 2 years and 89% after 3 years 1
  • Real-world effectiveness demonstrated in observational studies with steroid-free remission rates of 28.6-54% at one year 1
  • Particularly effective in patients with disease duration ≤2 years in Crohn's disease 1

IL-23 Inhibitors (Risankizumab, Mirikizumab, Guselkumab)

  • Strong recommendation for risankizumab and guselkumab in moderate-to-severe UC 1
  • Conditional recommendation for mirikizumab in moderate-to-severe UC 1
  • Clinical remission rates with risankizumab in UC: 18.5% vs 6.2% for placebo 1
  • Clinical remission rates with mirikizumab in UC: 24.1% vs 11.8% for placebo 1
  • Risankizumab showed efficacy in Crohn's disease with clinical remission rates of 51.8% vs 39.6% for placebo at week 52 1

Safety Profile Comparison

Vedolizumab

  • Excellent safety profile with no unexpected long-term safety signals identified 2
  • Gut-selective mechanism minimizes systemic immunosuppression 3
  • Lower risk of serious infections compared to TNF antagonists (32% reduction in UC patients) 1
  • Safe in special populations including pregnancy, elderly patients, and those with prior history of cancer 2
  • Well-tolerated with high continuation rates beyond induction dosing 4

IL-23 Inhibitors

  • Generally well-tolerated but with less long-term safety data compared to vedolizumab 1
  • Ustekinumab (IL-12/23 inhibitor) showed 51% lower risk of serious infections compared to TNF antagonists in Crohn's disease 1
  • Safety profile appears favorable but with shorter follow-up data compared to vedolizumab 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. First-line biologic choice:

    • For patients with moderate-to-severe IBD (both UC and CD): Vedolizumab is preferred due to its established long-term safety profile and gut-selective mechanism 1, 2
    • For patients with high risk of infections or malignancy (elderly, immunocompromised): Vedolizumab is strongly preferred due to gut-selective immunosuppression 1
  2. Consider IL-23 inhibitors when:

    • Patient has failed vedolizumab therapy 1
    • Patient has extraintestinal manifestations that may benefit from systemic immunomodulation 1
    • Specific comorbidities where IL-23 pathway inhibition may provide additional benefits 1
  3. Dosing considerations:

    • Vedolizumab: 300mg IV at weeks 0,2, and 6 for induction, then every 8 weeks for maintenance 5
    • Consider dose escalation to every 4 weeks in partial responders - approximately 50% of patients achieve/recapture response with this strategy 6
    • IL-23 inhibitors: Follow specific dosing for each agent (risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab) according to approved regimens 1

Special Considerations

  • Prior anti-TNF failure: Vedolizumab remains effective even in anti-TNF failure patients, though response rates are somewhat lower compared to anti-TNF naïve patients 1
  • Disease duration: Vedolizumab shows higher response rates in Crohn's disease of ≤2 years duration 1
  • Combination therapy: Due to its safety profile, vedolizumab is an excellent candidate for combination therapy with other biologics or small molecules in refractory cases 2
  • Subcutaneous formulation: Subcutaneous vedolizumab is now available as maintenance therapy with comparable efficacy to IV formulation, offering greater convenience 1

Conclusion on Best Choice

Vedolizumab represents the preferred option for moderate-to-severe IBD due to its established long-term safety profile, gut-selective mechanism minimizing systemic immunosuppression, and proven efficacy in both induction and maintenance of remission. While IL-23 inhibitors show promising results, the extensive long-term safety data and real-world experience with vedolizumab make it the superior choice for most patients with IBD, particularly those concerned about systemic immunosuppression or at higher risk for infections or malignancy.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.