What is the best diagnostic approach for a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis in a 14-year-old male with a lateral ankle injury, where the growth plate is not visible on initial X-ray, using spaced X-rays or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For a 14-year-old male with a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis, an MRI is the best diagnostic approach, as it offers superior visualization of soft tissue and cartilage, allowing for the detection of subtle physeal injuries not apparent on plain radiographs. The initial X-ray did not show a visible growth plate abnormality, but the patient's symptoms, such as tenderness over the lateral malleolus and ligamentous structures, warrant further investigation. According to the American College of Radiology 1, MRI is the reference standard for ligamentous injury and assessment of stability, particularly important in athletes. MRI can also help exclude Salter 1 fractures in the pediatric population 1.

The use of spaced X-rays may not be sufficient, as they lack sensitivity for non-displaced Salter-Harris I fractures, which are characterized by separation through the growth plate without visible displacement on X-ray. In contrast, MRI provides high-resolution evaluation of the tendons and ligaments, allowing distinction between tendinopathy, sprain, and partial or complete tears. Key benefits of MRI in this context include:

  • Detection of ligamentous injuries, including sprains, partial tears, and complete tears, which can occur without fracture on radiography 1
  • Evaluation of the associated ligamentous structures, such as the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL)
  • Assessment of bone bruise and adjacent soft-tissue edema, which have been shown to have a higher association with acute ligamentous injuries and tendon abnormalities 1

Given the importance of proper diagnosis and management in adolescents with open growth plates, an MRI is essential to prevent growth disturbances that could lead to angular deformities or leg length discrepancies. Treatment would depend on MRI findings, but typically involves immobilization for 3-4 weeks for non-displaced fractures.

From the Research

Diagnostic Approach for Suspected Salter-Harris Type 1 Fracture

  • The diagnosis of a Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis can be challenging, especially when the growth plate is not visible on initial X-ray 2, 3.
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be useful in diagnosing Salter-Harris type 1 fractures, as it can detect occult growth plate fractures and ligament injuries that may not be visible on X-ray 2, 3.
  • A study found that only 3.0% of children with clinically suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fractures of the distal fibula had MRI-confirmed fractures, while 80.0% had ligament injuries and 22.0% had isolated bone contusions 3.
  • Another study found that the clinical diagnosis of Salter-Harris type 1 fracture was incorrect in 100% of cases, and instead, MRI identified ligamentous sprains and/or bony contusions in almost 90% of patients 2.

Comparison of Imaging Modalities

  • Computed Tomography (CT) imaging may be necessary for evaluating growth plate fractures of the distal tibia, as it can provide more accurate information about the fracture and articular surface involvement compared to conventional radiographs (CR) 4.
  • However, CT imaging may not be necessary for all cases, and the decision to use CT should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the severity of the injury and the need for accurate diagnosis 4.
  • MRI is a useful imaging modality for evaluating ligament injuries and occult growth plate fractures, and can provide valuable information for diagnosis and treatment planning 2, 3.

Treatment and Management

  • The treatment and management of suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fractures of the distal fibular physis should be based on the diagnosis and severity of the injury, as well as the presence of any ligament injuries or other complications 5, 6.
  • A removable ankle brace and self-regulated return to activities may be a suitable treatment approach for children with radiograph-negative lateral ankle injuries, regardless of whether they have a fracture or a sprain 3.
  • Early closed reduction and fixation may be necessary for displaced Salter-Harris type 1 fractures of the distal fibula, to prevent complications such as premature physeal closure and growth disturbance 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Growth plate fractures of the distal tibia: is CT imaging necessary?

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2010

Research

Displaced Salter-Harris Type I Distal Fibula Fractures: Two Case Reports and a Review of the Literature.

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 2017

Research

Proximal Tibial Epiphysis Injury (Flexion Type, Salter-Harris Type 1).

Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2016

Related Questions

What is the risk of using spaced x-rays versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to diagnose a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis in a 14-year-old male with a right lateral ankle injury, where the growth plate is not visible on initial x-ray and there is concern for injury to the Anterior Talofibular Ligament (ATFL) and Calcaneofibular Ligament (CFL)?
What is the best diagnostic approach for a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis in a 14-year-old male with a lateral ankle injury, where the growth plate is not visible on initial X-ray, and there is concern for potential fracture and displacement, particularly with regards to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL)?
What is the most accurate diagnostic method, spaced x-rays or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), for detecting a fracture in a 14-year-old male with a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis, where the growth plate is not visible on initial x-ray?
What is the preferred diagnostic imaging method, spaced X-rays or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), to diagnose a potential fracture and displacement in a 14-year-old male with a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis, where the growth plate is not visible on initial X-ray?
What is the best diagnostic imaging modality, spaced x-rays or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), to diagnose a potential fracture and displacement in a 14-year-old male with a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis, where the growth plate is not visible on initial x-ray?
What is the treatment for gastroenteritis?
What is the next step in managing a pregnant woman with a glucose challenge test result of 150 mg/dL?
What is the first-line medication for gastritis?
What is the best diagnostic approach for a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis in a 14-year-old male with a lateral ankle injury, where the growth plate is not visible on initial X-ray, using spaced X-rays or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)?
Is Topamax (topiramate) a primary mood stabilizer?
What are the treatment options for an infected ingrown toenail (onychocryptosis)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.