What is the initial treatment for a Grade 3 splenic (spleen) laceration with hematoma in a hemodynamically stable patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Initial Treatment for Grade 3 Splenic Laceration with Hematoma in a Hemodynamically Stable Patient

Angiography/angioembolization (AG/AE) should be considered in all hemodynamically stable patients with WSES grade III lesions (which includes AAST grade III splenic lacerations), regardless of the presence of CT blush. 1

Assessment and Classification

  • Grade 3 splenic laceration corresponds to a WSES class II injury, characterized by subcapsular hematoma >50% surface area or expanding, ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal hematoma, intraparenchymal hematoma >5cm, or laceration >3cm parenchymal depth or involving trabecular vessels 1
  • Initial assessment must confirm hemodynamic stability, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg without signs of skin vasoconstriction, altered consciousness, shortness of breath, or requiring vasopressor support 1
  • CT scan with intravenous contrast should be performed in hemodynamically stable patients to define the anatomic splenic injury and identify associated injuries 1

Management Algorithm

For Hemodynamically Stable Patients:

  1. Non-operative management (NOM) is the first-line approach for hemodynamically stable patients with isolated splenic injury, regardless of injury grade 1

  2. Angiography/angioembolization (AG/AE) considerations:

    • AG/AE should be performed in all hemodynamically stable patients with WSES grade III lesions (including grade 3 lacerations), regardless of the presence of CT blush 1
    • AG/AE should be performed as part of NOM only in centers where it is rapidly available 1
    • In centers without immediate AG/AE availability, operative management should be considered if there are signs of ongoing bleeding 1
    • Coils are preferred to temporary agents when performing AG/AE 1
  3. Monitoring requirements:

    • Admission to an institution with 24/7 capacity to perform emergency hemostatic laparotomy 1
    • Continuous monitoring for at least the first 24 hours in an intensive care unit 1
    • Clinical and laboratory observation with bed rest for 48-72 hours 1
    • Clinical and biological observation for a minimum of 3-5 days 1

For Hemodynamic Deterioration During NOM:

  • Operative management should be performed if the patient develops hemodynamic instability or shows signs of persistent hemorrhage despite AG/AE 1
  • Splenectomy should be performed when NOM with AG/AE fails and the patient remains hemodynamically unstable, shows significant drop in hematocrit, or requires continuous transfusion 1

Follow-up During Hospitalization

  • Clinical and laboratory observation with bed rest is essential in the first 48-72 hours 1
  • CT scan repetition during admission should be considered in patients with moderate and severe lesions, decreasing hematocrit, vascular anomalies, underlying splenic pathology, coagulopathy, or neurological impairment 1
  • Monitor for intra-abdominal pressure elevation to detect abdominal compartment syndrome early 1

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Failure to recognize ongoing bleeding may lead to delayed splenic rupture, which can occur days to weeks after initial injury 2
  • Laparoscopic splenectomy is not recommended in early trauma scenarios with active bleeding 1, 3
  • Patients with severe traumatic brain injury and high-grade splenic injuries may benefit from early splenectomy in centers without immediate AG/AE availability 2
  • The presence of contrast blush on CT scan indicates active hemorrhage and is an important predictor of NOM failure (more than 60% of patients with blush fail NOM) 1
  • Patients with underlying splenic pathology may still be candidates for NOM if hemodynamically stable, though they require closer monitoring 4

By following this algorithm, the optimal management approach for a grade 3 splenic laceration with hematoma in a hemodynamically stable patient prioritizes splenic preservation while maintaining patient safety through appropriate monitoring and readiness for intervention if needed.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Indications for Splenectomy in Trauma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Laparoscopic splenectomy in blunt trauma.

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.