How do you differentiate between Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) and Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differentiating SVT from VT

When differentiating between Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) and Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), the QRS width is the initial distinguishing feature, with VT being the presumed diagnosis in wide complex tachycardias until proven otherwise due to its higher morbidity and mortality risk. 1

Initial Assessment Based on QRS Width

  • Narrow QRS Complex (<120 ms): Almost always indicates SVT 1
  • Wide QRS Complex (>120 ms): Could be either VT or SVT with aberrant conduction; should be treated as VT if diagnosis is uncertain 1

Diagnostic Criteria for Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia

ECG Criteria Favoring VT:

  • AV Dissociation: Presence of AV dissociation with ventricular rate faster than atrial rate is pathognomonic for VT 1
  • Fusion Complexes: Represent a merger between conducted sinus impulses and ventricular depolarization; pathognomonic for VT 1
  • QRS Morphology (Brugada Criteria):
    • Lack of any R-S complexes in precordial leads implies VT
    • R-S interval >100 ms in any precordial lead implies VT 1
  • QRS in Lead aVR (Vereckei Algorithm):
    • Initial R wave or Q wave >40 ms implies VT
    • Notch on descending limb at onset of predominantly negative QRS implies VT 1
  • QRS Width: >140 ms with RBBB pattern or >160 ms with LBBB pattern favors VT 1
  • QRS Concordance: All precordial leads showing either positive or negative deflections suggests VT 1
  • R-wave Peak Time: ≥50 ms in lead II suggests VT 1

Clinical History Factors Favoring VT:

  • History of prior myocardial infarction (positive predictive value >95% for VT) 2
  • History of congestive heart failure (positive predictive value >95% for VT) 2
  • History of recent angina pectoris (positive predictive value >95% for VT) 2
  • Age >35 years (sensitivity 92%, positive predictive value 85% for VT) 2

Diagnostic Criteria for Narrow QRS Complex Tachycardia (SVT)

P Wave Characteristics:

  • Hidden P waves: In AVNRT, P waves may be partially hidden within QRS complex, creating pseudo-R wave in V1 and/or pseudo-S wave in inferior leads 1
  • Visible P waves after QRS: In AVRT, P wave is visible in ST segment and separated from QRS by ≥70 ms 1
  • RP Relationship:
    • Short RP (RP < PR): Typical AVNRT or AVRT 1
    • Long RP (RP > PR): Atypical AVNRT, PJRT, or atrial tachycardia 1

Response to Interventions:

  • Adenosine Response: Different SVT mechanisms have characteristic responses to adenosine, which can aid diagnosis 1
  • Vagal Maneuvers: May terminate AVNRT and AVRT or temporarily slow atrial tachycardias 1, 3

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Assess QRS width:

    • If <120 ms: SVT is likely
    • If >120 ms: Consider both VT and SVT with aberrancy
  2. For wide QRS tachycardias:

    • Look for AV dissociation (most specific for VT)
    • Apply Brugada criteria and Vereckei algorithm
    • Check for fusion beats
    • Assess QRS concordance in precordial leads
  3. For narrow QRS tachycardias:

    • Assess regularity (irregular suggests AF, atrial flutter with variable conduction, or MAT)
    • Look for P wave location and RP relationship
    • Consider response to adenosine (if hemodynamically stable)

Important Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never assume stable vital signs rule out VT: Hemodynamic stability does not distinguish between SVT and VT 1
  • Avoid calcium channel blockers in undiagnosed wide complex tachycardias: These can precipitate hemodynamic collapse in VT 1
  • Don't rely solely on single-lead monitoring: Always obtain a 12-lead ECG for accurate diagnosis 4
  • When in doubt, treat as VT: If diagnosis of wide complex tachycardia is uncertain, safest approach is to treat as VT 1
  • Beware of pre-existing bundle branch block: This can make SVT appear as wide complex tachycardia 1
  • Consider SVT with accessory pathway conduction: Can present with wide QRS, especially with antidromic AVRT 1

Remember that accurate differentiation between SVT and VT is crucial for appropriate management and to prevent adverse outcomes, as misdiagnosis of VT as SVT can lead to inappropriate treatment and potentially fatal consequences 1, 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias.

The Journal of emergency medicine, 1996

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.