Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysm
Surgical or endovascular intervention is indicated for renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) larger than 2 cm in diameter, regardless of symptoms, to reduce the risk of rupture and associated morbidity and mortality. 1
Indications for Treatment
- Treatment is indicated for RAAs ≥2 cm in diameter to prevent rupture and associated complications 1, 2
- Intervention is warranted for symptomatic RAAs regardless of size, with symptoms including hypertension, hematuria, flank pain, or renal infarction 3
- Women of childbearing age with RAAs should be considered for repair due to increased rupture risk during pregnancy 3
- RAAs with rapid growth (≥5 mm in 6 months or ≥10 mm per year) may warrant intervention, similar to the approach for other arterial aneurysms 4
Treatment Options
Open Surgical Repair
- Aneurysmectomy with arterial reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment for RAAs, particularly for complex aneurysm anatomy 5
- Surgical techniques include:
- Open repair shows excellent technical success rates (100%) but is associated with longer hospital stays and higher perioperative morbidity 2, 3
Endovascular Treatment
- Endovascular coil embolization is indicated for narrow-necked, saccular, extraparenchymal aneurysms 1
- Advantages include shorter hospital stays (7.2 ± 6.9 days vs. 11.8 ± 6.7 days for open surgery) and lower morbidity rates 2, 3
- Technical success rates are slightly lower than open surgery (79.3% vs. 100%) 2
- Not suitable for all anatomical configurations, particularly complex hilar aneurysms with multiple branches 3
Minimally Invasive Approaches
- Robotic-assisted repair is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative when endovascular techniques are not suitable 6
- Allows for in-situ reconstruction with warm ischemia times ranging from 26-44 minutes 6
- Provides the benefits of minimally invasive surgery while enabling complex reconstructions 6
Factors Influencing Treatment Selection
- Aneurysm characteristics:
- Patient factors:
Outcomes and Follow-up
- Mortality rates are low (1.7%) with both open and endovascular approaches 2
- Morbidity is higher with open surgical repair (50% vs. 7.7% for endovascular) 3
- Potential complications include bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, arterial thrombosis, and bowel obstruction 3
- Long-term follow-up imaging is essential to monitor for aneurysm exclusion and renal artery patency 2, 3
- RAA repair may reduce medication requirements for patients with concurrent hypertension 5
Special Considerations
- For patients with RAAs, evaluation for concomitant aneurysms in other vascular beds is recommended, similar to the approach for other arterial aneurysms 4
- Preservation of renal function is paramount; significant decreases in GFR may occur following intervention 3
- The choice between open and endovascular repair should be based on aneurysm anatomy, patient comorbidities, and institutional expertise 2, 3