What are the treatment options for renal artery aneurysm?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysm

Surgical or endovascular intervention is indicated for renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) larger than 2 cm in diameter, regardless of symptoms, to reduce the risk of rupture and associated morbidity and mortality. 1

Indications for Treatment

  • Treatment is indicated for RAAs ≥2 cm in diameter to prevent rupture and associated complications 1, 2
  • Intervention is warranted for symptomatic RAAs regardless of size, with symptoms including hypertension, hematuria, flank pain, or renal infarction 3
  • Women of childbearing age with RAAs should be considered for repair due to increased rupture risk during pregnancy 3
  • RAAs with rapid growth (≥5 mm in 6 months or ≥10 mm per year) may warrant intervention, similar to the approach for other arterial aneurysms 4

Treatment Options

Open Surgical Repair

  • Aneurysmectomy with arterial reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment for RAAs, particularly for complex aneurysm anatomy 5
  • Surgical techniques include:
    • In-situ repair with patch angioplasty or primary repair for accessible aneurysms 1, 5
    • Ex-vivo reconstruction for complex hilar aneurysms involving multiple branches 5, 3
    • End-to-end anastomosis after aneurysm resection 3
  • Open repair shows excellent technical success rates (100%) but is associated with longer hospital stays and higher perioperative morbidity 2, 3

Endovascular Treatment

  • Endovascular coil embolization is indicated for narrow-necked, saccular, extraparenchymal aneurysms 1
  • Advantages include shorter hospital stays (7.2 ± 6.9 days vs. 11.8 ± 6.7 days for open surgery) and lower morbidity rates 2, 3
  • Technical success rates are slightly lower than open surgery (79.3% vs. 100%) 2
  • Not suitable for all anatomical configurations, particularly complex hilar aneurysms with multiple branches 3

Minimally Invasive Approaches

  • Robotic-assisted repair is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative when endovascular techniques are not suitable 6
  • Allows for in-situ reconstruction with warm ischemia times ranging from 26-44 minutes 6
  • Provides the benefits of minimally invasive surgery while enabling complex reconstructions 6

Factors Influencing Treatment Selection

  • Aneurysm characteristics:
    • Size and growth rate 1, 2
    • Location (hilar vs. extraparenchymal) 3
    • Morphology (saccular vs. fusiform) 1, 3
  • Patient factors:
    • Age and comorbidities 2
    • Presence of hypertension 5, 3
    • Renal function 3

Outcomes and Follow-up

  • Mortality rates are low (1.7%) with both open and endovascular approaches 2
  • Morbidity is higher with open surgical repair (50% vs. 7.7% for endovascular) 3
  • Potential complications include bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, arterial thrombosis, and bowel obstruction 3
  • Long-term follow-up imaging is essential to monitor for aneurysm exclusion and renal artery patency 2, 3
  • RAA repair may reduce medication requirements for patients with concurrent hypertension 5

Special Considerations

  • For patients with RAAs, evaluation for concomitant aneurysms in other vascular beds is recommended, similar to the approach for other arterial aneurysms 4
  • Preservation of renal function is paramount; significant decreases in GFR may occur following intervention 3
  • The choice between open and endovascular repair should be based on aneurysm anatomy, patient comorbidities, and institutional expertise 2, 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.