What imaging studies are recommended for a 15-year-old male with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging Recommendations for UTI in a 15-Year-Old Male

For a 15-year-old male with a urinary tract infection (UTI), ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder is the only imaging study typically recommended, as routine imaging beyond this is not indicated for a first UTI in this age group.

Initial Imaging Approach

  • Ultrasound of the kidneys and bladder is the primary imaging modality for adolescents with UTI, though even this may not be necessary for a first uncomplicated UTI in a patient over 6 years of age 1
  • The incidence of new-onset UTI in children >6 years is low and often associated with behavioral abnormalities, dysfunctional elimination syndrome, or initiation of sexual intercourse in adolescents 1
  • Males are less commonly affected by UTI in this age group compared to females 1
  • The likelihood of detecting previously unknown underlying renal anomalies is low in adolescents with first-time UTI 1

Evidence-Based Recommendations by Age Group

  • The ACR Appropriateness Criteria specifically addresses different age groups:
    • For children <2 months: More conservative imaging approach is needed due to higher risk of sepsis and renal anomalies 1
    • For children 2 months to 6 years: Ultrasound is usually appropriate for first febrile UTI 1
    • For children >6 years (including 15-year-olds): There is usually no need for imaging to guide treatment for a first febrile UTI with good response to treatment 1

When Additional Imaging May Be Warranted

Additional imaging should be considered in the following circumstances:

  • Atypical or complicated UTI presentation, including:

    • Poor response to antibiotics within 48 hours 1
    • Sepsis 1
    • Poor urine stream 1
    • Elevated creatinine 1
    • Non-E. coli UTI 1
    • Recurrent UTI 1
  • If any of these conditions are present, consider:

    • Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) or nuclear medicine cystography to evaluate for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) 1
    • DMSA renal scan to evaluate for pyelonephritis or renal scarring in recurrent cases 1

Limitations of Ultrasound

  • Ultrasound alone has limited sensitivity for detecting:
    • Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) 1, 2
    • Renal parenchymal abnormalities 1, 2
    • Pyelonephritis (detects only about 25% of acute cases) 1
    • Renal scarring (detects only about 40% of cases) 1
  • One study showed ultrasound sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 37.5%, with a negative predictive value of 81.8% 2

Advanced Imaging Considerations

  • CT is generally not indicated for uncomplicated UTI in adolescents 1
  • CT may be appropriate for evaluating complications such as renal abscess or xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis 1
  • MRI is not routinely used in UTI evaluation due to high cost, limited availability, and lack of evidence supporting its use in this context 1

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Avoid unnecessary radiation exposure from VCUG or CT in adolescents with first uncomplicated UTI 1
  • Don't assume all UTIs in adolescent males require extensive imaging workup - this age group has lower prevalence of anatomic abnormalities compared to infants 1
  • Remember that normal ultrasound findings don't completely exclude the possibility of VUR or renal scarring due to the limited sensitivity of ultrasound 1, 2
  • Consider that UTI in adolescent males is less common than in females and may warrant investigation for underlying causes if recurrent 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.