How is heart failure classified based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Heart failure is classified into three main categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) with an LVEF of 40% or less, Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) with an LVEF of 50% or greater, and Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF) with an LVEF between 41-49%.

Classification of Heart Failure

The classification of heart failure based on LVEF is crucial because it influences prognosis, treatment approaches, and response to therapies 1.

  • HFrEF is defined as an LVEF of 40% or less, representing systolic dysfunction where the heart cannot contract effectively.
  • HFpEF is characterized by an LVEF of 50% or greater, where the heart contracts normally but cannot relax properly, impairing filling.
  • HFmrEF includes patients with an LVEF between 41-49%, which is considered an evolving category where some patients may benefit from therapies traditionally used for HFrEF.

Clinical Importance of Classification

This classification is clinically important because treatment approaches differ significantly between categories.

  • HFrEF has well-established guideline-directed medical therapies including ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors that improve mortality.
  • HFpEF management focuses more on symptom control and treating underlying conditions like hypertension.
  • HFmrEF patients may benefit from therapies traditionally used for HFrEF, but the approach is still evolving.

Regular Assessment of LVEF

Regular echocardiographic assessment of LVEF is essential for proper classification and treatment optimization as a patient's category may change over time with disease progression or improvement 1. The most recent guidelines emphasize the importance of LVEF in classifying heart failure and guiding treatment decisions 1.

From the Research

Classification of Heart Failure based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

  • Heart failure (HF) is categorized into three main types based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF):
    • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), defined as LVEF ≥50% 2, 3
    • Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), defined as LVEF <40% 2, 4, 5
    • Heart failure with mid-range or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), defined as LVEF between 40-49% 2, 4, 5

Characteristics of Each Category

  • HFpEF is a heterogeneous disorder with increasing prevalence in the elderly, and its pathogenesis remains incompletely understood 3
  • HFrEF is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to HFmrEF and HFpEF 4
  • HFmrEF is considered an intermediate clinical entity between HFrEF and HFpEF, with a milder condition than HFrEF but similar to HFrEF in terms of the high prevalence of ischemic heart disease 4, 5

Treatment and Prognosis

  • Therapies effective in patients with HFrEF may also be effective in patients with HFmrEF 4, 5
  • The risk of non-cardiovascular adverse events is similar or greater in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF compared to those with HFrEF 4
  • LVEF is a continuous variable, and cutpoints are arbitrary, often based on historical clinical trial enrichment decisions rather than physiology 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.